ramsy
NoFixNoPay Electric
- Location
- LA basin, CA
- Occupation
- Service Electrician 2020 NEC
Ok George, I cut & paste this one here.
Since, Wiggy's require some amperage to move the solenoid they can be used to varify current, along with the voltage reading. But, amp sensitivity varies on solenoid testers, and when shorting a lifted svc.neutral with an open disconnect, ~1.9vac may not move a solenoid at all. So, I thought a digital meter's mA function may best confirm current in this case (whatever the source).
A normal Hz function can confirm if the source of that current includes Zero-sequence neutral harmonics or noise, only if frequencies greater than 60Hz are the dominant magnitude. And, as I understand it, since positive and negative sequences (usually cancel each other on the phases) they are less likely to be a dominant magnitude.
So, a DMM can not replace expensive harmonics meters, further harmonic current won't add like harmonic frequencies, but DMM's can confirm current, and Hz frequencies that are the dominant magnitude.
I have a Fluke application document, explaining how to find harmonics without expensive meters, but you'll need to PM me with an email for a copy of that PDF, since mikeholt's attachment feature doesn't work for me. If it works for others, maybe my browser's cooky settings need to be adjusted?
On Apr 30, 2006, jg3317 wrote in mikeholts Power Quality forum,
Google's cach shows the whole thread, so you must brows to the very bottom of the page to see the post above.
Since, Wiggy's require some amperage to move the solenoid they can be used to varify current, along with the voltage reading. But, amp sensitivity varies on solenoid testers, and when shorting a lifted svc.neutral with an open disconnect, ~1.9vac may not move a solenoid at all. So, I thought a digital meter's mA function may best confirm current in this case (whatever the source).
A normal Hz function can confirm if the source of that current includes Zero-sequence neutral harmonics or noise, only if frequencies greater than 60Hz are the dominant magnitude. And, as I understand it, since positive and negative sequences (usually cancel each other on the phases) they are less likely to be a dominant magnitude.
So, a DMM can not replace expensive harmonics meters, further harmonic current won't add like harmonic frequencies, but DMM's can confirm current, and Hz frequencies that are the dominant magnitude.
I have a Fluke application document, explaining how to find harmonics without expensive meters, but you'll need to PM me with an email for a copy of that PDF, since mikeholt's attachment feature doesn't work for me. If it works for others, maybe my browser's cooky settings need to be adjusted?
On Apr 30, 2006, jg3317 wrote in mikeholts Power Quality forum,
jg3317 said:I will have to admit I was and still am confused by the readings I received. I took my digital meter that has Hertz reading and placed meter between to cables I removed and the neutral bar and had a reading of 147 Hertz and was not a steading reading jumped from about 130 to 180 hertz.
I had to use Google's cach of mikeholts forum, since the 2 month old link is broke. Googles advanced search was used to specify mikeholt.com as the URL, then typed in my search term, since mikeholts search feature can't find phrases. http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:TRV2A474420J:www.mikeholt.com/codeForum/viewtopic.php%3Fp%3D1189941%26sid%3D5a228c1fd408ac7e98b77c07ead8b958+ramsy+%22the+big+one%22+site:mikeholt.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1ramsy said:AKA triplen or Zero-sequence harmonics. Meter reads the highest magnitude, so congratulations, you caught the big one without buying a costly analyzer.
Google's cach shows the whole thread, so you must brows to the very bottom of the page to see the post above.