The phyicist did not say it was untestable; he said it was unanswerable as presented. Diifferent conditions would apply at different times and that the engineers who tested for these conditions were probably correct and that the fact that the NEC does not address his issue would imply that it is TOTALLY IRREVALANT. The straps are rated for installation in either position, so IWIRE is correct! It is solely a matter of opinion regarding the position. If you want to argue this further, bring on your numbers! I miss physics and calculus, so I would gladly spar numbers.
the notion that calculus would be required to calculate the simple mechanics or dynamics of this problem, whether including the deformable portion or not, is a little over the top imo. I am of the opinion that Karl is correct, but I also realize that the problem (in terms of its finite technical description) has yet to be adequately described. For example, consider the following widely varying parameters:
1) pipe size (I'm sure this conversation was mostly about 1/2 or 3/4 ?)
2) anchor type
3) screw type and size
4) washer used or not used (a critical issue for lower density substrates)
5) substrate (critically important, and probably overriding factor)
6) the strap itself (cheap metal strap or rigid strap - again a vital factor)
While the conversation has rambled through all these pages, everyone posting may have widely different trade practices as to what they had envisioned regarding the above, and because the physics of the problem was not precisely identified, the conversations may have been about completely different installations (with the relative strengths of the differing materials varying to such a wide degree).
- just my 2 cents