petersonra
Senior Member
- Location
- Northern illinois
- Occupation
- engineer
The answer then is to pass a law banning such storms.As storms become more frequent and in size, the break even point lowers rapidly.
The answer then is to pass a law banning such storms.As storms become more frequent and in size, the break even point lowers rapidly.
The answer then is to pass a law banning such storms.
Even if there was such a law, just how would one go about burying this kind of line. You can pass a law mandating just about anything but being able to carry it out is something else.Or a law requiring the gradual burial of all powerlines.
Even if there was such a law, just how would one go about burying this kind of line. You can pass a law mandating just about anything but being able to carry it out is something else.
View attachment 2557078
It would be just another boondoggle like the high speed rail in CA that goes from nowhere to nowhere.
maybe a better solution is having power generation closer to where it is used so transmission lines are less necessary.
Cogen failed pretty miserably once the subsidies ran out.Co-gen is certainly viable in theory and should be researched further.
Don't know about your supermarkets, but most of the big ones around here have some type of back-up generator. Those that have full backup and the generator runs behind the store in a sound enclosure or in a dedicated room, you don't hear it running, the inside of the store functions like normal. In theory you could do the same with a gas turbine, and, use the exhaust heat to drive absorption cooling, domestic hot water and heat in the winter. Nothing is wasted, gas mains come buried.
Here in the south, very few supermarkets have generators, and the ones that do, it usually is just lighting and registers. Most can go a couple of hours if they cover the open coolers, and dry ice. Many have Kirk key set ups for portable connection to large generators in areas that have frequent power outages due to weather. Many recoup heat from the refrigeration system for hot water needs in theTo be honest any transmission line over 150 miles is better being left overhead, but those around trees could be technically feasible and economical in a relative sense.
Co-gen is certainly viable in theory and should be researched further.
Don't know about your supermarkets, but most of the big ones around here have some type of back-up generator. Those that have full backup and the generator runs behind the store in a sound enclosure or in a dedicated room, you don't hear it running, the inside of the store functions like normal. In theory you could do the same with a gas turbine, and, use the exhaust heat to drive absorption cooling, domestic hot water and heat in the winter. Nothing is wasted, gas mains come buried.
Around here transmission voltages typically are not threatened by trees. Most the medium voltage local distribution isn't under too much threat, it is the low voltage secondary that is usually subject to damage by trees.And I know I'm ranking on distro, but lets be serious for a moment, transmission is not sparred:
People that don't know much about it don't understand how impractical or expensive it is to put ALL power lines underground. Most the transmission level voltages are still best to be overhead cost wise.
Even if there was such a law, just how would one go about burying this kind of line. You can pass a law mandating just about anything but being able to carry it out is something else.
View attachment 2557078
It would be just another boondoggle like the high speed rail in CA that goes from nowhere to nowhere.
maybe a better solution is having power generation closer to where it is used so transmission lines are less necessary.
Or an excise tax on fossil fuels.Or a law requiring the gradual burial of all powerlines.
Many times just a branch (sometimes a large one) falls but never hits the line unless it was hanging over or pretty near to being over the line.I was in Minnesota a couple of years ago, they had quite a few windmills, but only one out of five on average was working. (At least turning, don’t know if they were actually putting out). Where I live is a tourist destination, so they won’t let the power company clear a very wide right of way. They claim because of that, if a tree falls on the line, the property owner can be charged the cost of the repair. Never heard of anyone getting charged though.
All of our outages are trees falling on lines, usually tall pines. Usually snaps the line, but not the poles. Wind plus saturated ground, or ice.Many times just a branch (sometimes a large one) falls but never hits the line unless it was hanging over or pretty near to being over the line.
Otherwise you often need weak base (old rotted core) and/or pretty severe winds that uproot the entire tree for it to be able to fall on lines.
Tall pines not very common here. I can see those being the entire tree going down more often than that happens here with most trees - other than ones with old rotten core near the base. Big cottonwoods and maples are common and usually getting a branch that breaks off and not the whole tree coming down, especially in thunderstorms or ice storms. Both those species of tree grows fast but is somewhat weak for withstanding winds compared to many other species. People plant them to get shade trees in faster time, then when they are an excellent shade tree along comes some storm that takes a lot of it out and they end up cutting the entire tree down.All of our outages are trees falling on lines, usually tall pines. Usually snaps the line, but not the poles. Wind plus saturated ground, or ice.
All of our outages are trees falling on lines, usually tall pines. Usually snaps the line, but not the poles. Wind plus saturated ground, or ice.
not on my turfA few thousand without power for up to seven days.
It was a very rare event here.
It would probably be more cost-effective overall for people to just buy a whole house generator rather than paying to berry power lines.not on my turf
fact is they should just rename my state generacland
~RJ~
I agree, however I think a looped or networked approach may help.
The closer the failure is to the customer the fewer people are affected. A failure of a big line might cut off tens of thousands of people while the lines running along my back yard only affect a handful of houses. If reliability is a problem, it would be best to start with the things that give you the most bang for your buck like getting tree trimming done in a timely manner. Burying transmission lines is way down the list, especially in rural areas.