Welded? This is off topic somewhat, but I thought the laminations had to be insulated from one another?
On a transformer yes
on a motor the iron lamnations for a given phase/pole are bonded for magnetic homogeneity
good flux gradient/consistency
Welded? This is off topic somewhat, but I thought the laminations had to be insulated from one another?
Welded? This is off topic somewhat, but I thought the laminations had to be insulated from one another?
View attachment 17281On a transformer yes
on a motor the iron lamnations for a given phase/pole are bonded for magnetic homogeneity
good flux gradient/consistency
what helped me was using a simulation/modeling program
Ingenieur, just curious what software do you use for construction / modeling??
Over the years I have written various programs to simplify/automate routine calcs. This was to make it quicker for me but I had hoped to engage my colleagues and get some of the work load off me.not really for construction but for education/verification
matlab/simulink, great for power electronics and control
plecs simulink plug-in
and a power program developed by the Canadian hydro utilities (Pscad) https://hvdc.ca/pscad/
I have some that came with this text, great stuff but overkill and difficult to use
https://www.crcpress.com/Computer-A...sis-Second-Edition/Kusic/p/book/9781420061062
had the author for the course, so we had to use it, tough course, started with 8, 3 of us finished
Yes, exactly. The transistors will have a relatively fixed amount of switching losses, but the higher rate means more cumulative PU current losses. The heat sinks will be designed to radiate and dissipate the heat based on the losses at the stated maximum CF. Heat sinks are a very expensive part of a drive, and people tend to want smaller-cheaper-better with every successive generation, so this is one of the consequences.... why derate? Due to increased temperatures due to the higher switching rate?
so lower current capability to maintain a max device temp?
Yes, exactly. The transistors will have a relatively fixed amount of switching losses, but the higher rate means more cumulative PU current losses. The heat sinks will be designed to radiate and dissipate the heat based on the losses at the stated maximum CF. Heat sinks are a very expensive part of a drive, and people tend to want smaller-cheaper-better with every successive generation, so this is one of the consequences.
25+ years ago as VFDs began to get affordable and popular, CF was not adjustable. Toshiba released what at the time were called their "quiet drives" that had an adjustable CF up to 10kHz in I think around 1990(?), which took the HVAC drives market by storm. That's because air handlers where the motor is inside of the air stream were conducting the motor whining sound down through the air ducts into quiet rooms and causing complaints. HVAC was and still is the largest market for VFDs, so when Toshiba's quiet drives took off it forced every other mfr to adapt or perish. Early versions of drives were over designed and had lots of extra heat sink, so de-rating wasn't as big of a deal at first. But every successive design generation began using smaller faster transistors with lower losses, yet less heat sink at the same time. So now we have adjustable CF even though most of the time we don't need it, on drives that are designed so close to the bone that they require de-rating if you turn it up.
Ingenieur, I apologize construction was the wrong word, yes looking for a software to play around with for my education interest I figure its cheaper than getting my hands on a drive / motor / scope and playing around [although that would be pretty kool], looking more at simulation and the associated wave forms..I like you drawings, just curious what is the 66/250 reference and the 26, 40, etc? if the bottom one is related to higher fc then it looks like you have potentially more "overshoot" resulting in higher harmonics as well?