wirebender
Senior Member
- Location
- North Central Texas
..................
The dots were just to make the post long enough.
The dots were just to make the post long enough.
..................
The dots were just to make the post long enough.
14 on switch legs.
They do not require any 15 amp CBs.
Let me get this straight. They require all #12, but allow #14 for switch legs on a 20 amp circuit. Right?
If so, that now tops the list as the dumbest local code rule I've ever heard. Not just because it's an NEC violation, but because it just defies logic altogether.
Let me get this straight. They require all #12, but allow #14 for switch legs on a 20 amp circuit. Right?
If so, that now tops the list as the dumbest local code rule I've ever heard. Not just because it's an NEC violation, but because it just defies logic altogether.
Yes, that is correct.
The funny part is that an ex inspector from there told me the reason they started allowing only #12 was so that if a circuit transitioned from 12 to 14 then the inspectors would not have to trace the circuit back to the panel to see if it was on a 15A CB.:grin:
I can only assume they had a problem with people running #12 home runs to a room and spidering out with #14.
Yes, that is correct.
The funny part is that an ex inspector from there told me the reason they started allowing only #12 was so that if a circuit transitioned from 12 to 14 then the inspectors would not have to trace the circuit back to the panel to see if it was on a 15A CB.:grin:
I can only assume they had a problem with people running #12 home runs to a room and spidering out with #14.
..............
Whoever suggested this local rule should be shot, hung, dragged and quartered, stoned, placed in a rack, and burned at the stake.![]()
Don't hold back, Ken, state your true feelings.:grin:
I would, but the language I'd use would be appropriate. I don't wanna get kicked off the forum.....![]()
Does using "appropriate" language get us thrown off the forum?![]()
Does using "appropriate" language get us thrown off the forum?![]()
Whoever suggested this local rule should be shot, hung, dragged and quartered, stoned, placed in a rack, and burned at the stake.
The "appropriate language" may just be "offensive words"![]()
I think he should be forced to spend an hour with Marc. That's punishment enough.![]()
I think he should be forced to spend an hour with Marc. That's punishment enough.![]()
I think he should be forced to spend an hour with Marc. That's punishment enough.![]()
I'm pretty sure you've spoken with me for at least an hour, and you appear to have survived.
I like your thought on this subject. If it's UL approved then it's fine. If you build it they will come.I have no problem with (an) a electrical contractor using the backstabs as long as they use them properly and quite frankly they can pigtail if they choose as well.
Personally I don't call them HACKs or what ever some wish to call them..I call them Electricians who choose to use the device potentially in the manner that UL Listed the device and if it has back stabs on it and they use it properly...fine and I pass their installation accordingly.
Now with that said...I would say the majority of my work I pigtailed but I can honestly say in my 20+ year career I have used the backstabs on more than one situation....
As to being a HACK when I did it......nope..I felt no different, no need for a shower to wash off the HACKNESS and well......if it comes loose down the road, so be it as I will let UL deal with the issue if they deem the need.