Portable Nuclear Substation fits in a truck

Status
Not open for further replies.
When the typical nuclear powerplant generates 600 MW(e) and contains 100 tons of fuel rods, something that generates 1 MW(e) and weighs less then 40 tons* definitely qualifies as "small".

* just guessing about its weight, based on "fits on a truck".
Ahhhh, did you mistake a "G" for an "M"?

No details in this article, but Wiki shows SMR's up to 1GW are not necessarily a pebble-bed reactor design.
 
It seems to me that 1GW is really pushing the definition of "small"!

Better to quote the Wiki laguage since I may have that wrong.

"Small modular reactors (SMRs) are nuclear fission reactors that are smaller than conventional nuclear reactors and typically have an electrical power output of less than 300 MWe or a thermal power output of less than 1000 MWth."

if I understand that language correctly, typical efficiency of SMR's heat to electricity is right around 30%
 
Last edited:
... if I understand that language correctly, typical efficiency of SMRs heat to electricity is right around 30%
Yes, that's correct. But not limited to SMRs -- you can expect about that same efficiency from any thermal powerplant, limited by ambient temperature on the cold side of the thermodynamic cycle (Carnot) and metallurgy on the hot side.
 
Better to quote the Wiki laguage since I may have that wrong.

"Small modular reactors (SMRs) are nuclear fission reactors that are smaller than conventional nuclear reactors and typically have an electrical power output of less than 300 MWe or a thermal power output of less than 1000 MWth."

if I understand that language correctly, typical efficiency of SMR's heat to electricity is right around 30%
Somehow I doubt that a 1,000 MWt plant is fitting on/in a trailer.
 
It might also depend on how big your trailer is.
OK, now you're just getting silly. 😁 As impressive as it is, I doubt even that would carry a 1,000 MWt plant.
 
By definition, 1 kiloton yield is defined as the release of 4.184*10^12 Joules of energy. (Number derived from the release of 10^9 kilocalories.)
The difficulty is converting it to equivalent electrical or thermal power, since power is the instantaneous rate of energy production, it would matter what time interval the yield was released over. Power output would (maybe) follow a Gaussian curve, as the production of neutrons peaked and dropped off once the fuel was too dispersed by the explosion to sustain the chain reaction? Any nuclear engineers in the house?
 
Yes.
I'm pretty sure it's not Gaussian. Nothing happens until it goes critical, then the nuclear reaction runs to completion pretty fast, (I've heard 30 ns, or "three shakes", but can't confirm) the temperature reaches something like a hundred million degrees C, and finally the core, ahem, disassembles itself and releases all that energy.

That's for a single-stage fission device. A multi-stage device is even less Gaussian.
 
The difficulty is converting it to equivalent electrical or thermal power, since power is the instantaneous rate of energy production, it would matter what time interval the yield was released over. Power output would (maybe) follow a Gaussian curve, as the production of neutrons peaked and dropped off once the fuel was too dispersed by the explosion to sustain the chain reaction? Any nuclear engineers in the house?
Yes.
I'm pretty sure it's not Gaussian. Nothing happens until it goes critical, then the nuclear reaction runs to completion pretty fast, (I've heard 30 ns, or "three shakes", but can't confirm) the temperature reaches something like a hundred million degrees C, and finally the core, ahem, disassembles itself and releases all that energy.

That's for a single-stage fission device. A multi-stage device is even less Gaussian.

There's more detail about this here:

https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4-1.html
 
Bill Gates is building a 350 MW sodium reactor in Wyoming, to replace coal plant and keep workers employed.

 
My father bought our first black and white TV in 1960 or 1961. It was an early non-console receiver. It was portable in the sense that you didn't need a crane to move it, although you might wish for one. My dad re-coined such items as "luggable".
Much more recently than that I goodwilled our 32" living room "portable" CRT TV and bought a similarly dimensioned flat screen TV to replace it. It took two of us to lug that 150lb behemoth out to the wife's minivan. I can carry the flat screen under one arm.
 
Bill Gates is building a 350 MW sodium reactor in Wyoming, to replace coal plant and keep workers employed.

Well, good for Bill if he can find the capital for the project.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top