- Occupation
- Licensed Electrician
• Perform a soil resistivity test at the site as described in Appendix B, “Soil Resistivity
Measurements”
• Calculate the resistance of a single ground rod as described in “Interpreting Test Results” on
page B-10.
• Determine the resistance requirement of the grounding electrode system, based on the site type
(“Light Duty” or “Standard Duty
Yes, and this is frequently done on aircraft. What you don't have with this situation is a network of conductors connecting it to other objects. Lightning striking one aircraft isn't going to send a surge of voltage through the supply network and to other objects on the network.Could you take an AC system, complete from generator to outlet, and have it function properly floating on a blimp, not connected to the earth?
A GES is not a lightning protection system, direct hit can still happen and damages from such hit can result. It can help reduce voltage rise seen at a premises when there is a nearby strike. The more structures you have between you and that strike, each with a grounding electrode, gives you more chance of seeing little to no rise on the conductors supplying your premises.I think you should be careful thinking that the NEC required GES does much, if anything, to help with lightning. I think it's definitely the case that some people who've had a hand in writing the code think that. But my understanding is that in reality it's not going to help all that much.
...
By the way, the NEC allows some systems to be ungrounded by design. But those systems should still have a GES, and the NEC requires it.
I'm not saying there's a better way- although we've found out there is in the Norway/OR example which is expensive. I'm saying I've gotten into too many debates with electricians who think ground rods are for clearing faults or that when they get shocked it's electricity passing through them to the earth.
Electricity always returns to it's source. We bond the metal parts to neutral to clear a fault and that's usually the same reason we get shocked.
We drive ground rods for lightning.
Never mind the blimp or hospital OR. lol.
The overall point is I've come across too many electricians, inspectors, and more that don't understand the purpose of the grounding electrode system. Either that or I'm wrong. So let me explain one more time.
The MBJ is responsible for carrying fault current to neutral where it wants to go (source).
The grounding electrodes are mainly for lightning, static, other foreign over voltages and to stabilize the voltage during normal conditions- though I don't understand what we are stabilizing it from.
The GEC to a water pipe is the lone wolf in that it can potentially become energized by our ungrounded conductors and that's why we size it in proportion to our service. All other connections with our GE's are usually significantly smaller because they are NOT responsible to carry a fault.
So we are 5 pages in, and it seems like many on here are endorsing the idea that ground rods have something to do with faults and/or something to do with protection from getting shocked by our system.
What's interesting is it's literally explained in one of the first NEC articles in Grouding: we make a connection to earth for lightning, static...
I think the confusion comes from the word 'ground fault'. It should be called "non-energized conductive surface fault", we should call our EGC's "equipment bonding conductors" and there should be an explanation for why we size our water pipe GEC according to service size. Grounding should be understood and treated as our connection to earth for overvoltages and bonding should be our connection to all building conductive surfaces to clear faults.
Never mind the blimp or hospital OR. lol.
The overall point is I've come across too many electricians, inspectors, and more that don't understand the purpose of the grounding electrode system. Either that or I'm wrong. So let me explain one more time.
The MBJ is responsible for carrying fault current to neutral where it wants to go (source).
The grounding electrodes are mainly for lightning, static, other foreign over voltages and to stabilize the voltage during normal conditions- though I don't understand what we are stabilizing it from.
The GEC to a water pipe is the lone wolf in that it can potentially become energized by our ungrounded conductors and that's why we size it in proportion to our service. All other connections with our GE's are usually significantly smaller because they are NOT responsible to carry a fault.
So we are 5 pages in, and it seems like many on here are endorsing the idea that ground rods have something to do with faults
and/or something to do with protection from getting shocked by our system.
What's interesting is it's literally explained in one of the first NEC articles in Grouding: we make a connection to earth for lightning, static...
I think the confusion comes from the word 'ground fault'. It should be called "non-energized conductive surface fault", we should call our EGC's "equipment bonding conductors" and there should be an explanation for why we size our water pipe GEC according to service size. Grounding should be understood and treated as our connection to earth for foreign overvoltages and bonding should be our connection to all building conductive surfaces to clear faults.
The grounding electrodes are mainly for lightning, static, other foreign over voltages and to stabilize the voltage during normal conditions- though I don't understand what we are stabilizing it from.
Here's another example...
Somewhat recently I came upon a subpanel in a detached garage, and there was no EGC from the main house to the subpanel, as is required today (but wasn't when it was installed). But there was also no neutral-to-ground bond at the subpanel. So if there had been a circuit faulting to the panel or any conduit bonded to it, no breaker would have tripped. But at least there was a ground rod. That greatly reduced the chances that, if there had been such a circuit, and I had touched the panel housing, any current wanting to flow would have found a happier path through me than through the ground rod.
Bingo jaggedben. All separate structures must have grounding electrode per. 250.32. Since it's a subpanel you do NOT bond. You connect your GEC for that seperate structure to the EGC's, add an EGC going back to the house panel and you're done.
If I'm not mistaken, the old code used to let us rebond (neutral-EGC's) in the subpanel at the seperate structure. That's probably why there wasn't an EGC at the garage you visited. Newer codes require the EGC just like any other subpanel. Now the reason we have to set new ground rods on a seperate structure is to offer equal potential between the electrical system at the seperate structure and earth for foreign over voltage, (lightning, static, high voltage utility) - we don't want to leave the GE's at the garage out and rely on the EGC that should be ran back to the main panel for that path.
Once again, the ground rods were not there for clearing a fault. It was an old wiring method you saw that still was out of compliance (with the old code) because it wasn't even bonded.
Hope that came out clear. Shot out to JPinVA for better explaining it.
...I think the confusion comes from the word 'ground fault'. It should be called "non-energized conductive surface fault", we should call our EGC's "equipment bonding conductors" and there should be an explanation for why we size our water pipe GEC according to service size. Grounding should be understood and treated as our connection to earth for foreign overvoltages and bonding should be our connection to all building conductive surfaces to clear faults.
If I'm not mistaken, the old code used to let us rebond (neutral-EGC's) in the subpanel at the seperate structure. That's probably why there wasn't an EGC at the garage you visited. Newer codes require the EGC just like any other subpanel. Now the reason we have to set new ground rods on a seperate structure is to offer equal potential between the electrical system at the seperate structure and earth for foreign over voltage, (lightning, static, high voltage utility) - we don't want to leave the GE's at the garage out and rely on the EGC that should be ran back to the main panel for that path.
actually, if you check the 18th edition and check that video, you will find the video came out, like many concerning Arc Fault, before the 18th was released. T-T section has been changed to require extra work to bring it within the regs but no extra ground rods required and the section was finally modified to say we do not need to bond interior metal pipework for water or gas if the entry is plastic... unless the interior pipework is run in such a way as it could be energised.
Extra ground rods or CEE is only required in commercial if it meets certain requirements but TN-s and TN-C-S stayed the same... at least according to SparkChannel and JW...lol... Have not yet recieved my birthday present of the book , but have the onsite guide and the students guide.