- Location
- Wisconsin
- Occupation
- PE (Retired) - Power Systems
Which are typically listed for use with only 2 or 3 conductors.I took it to mean he uses a split bolt connector.
Which are typically listed for use with only 2 or 3 conductors.I took it to mean he uses a split bolt connector.
I'm talking stator wires. I can't see how this would be a failure point.There is one motor company still making them this way. TONS of comm failures. I’d name names but I can’t remember which one.
You’ve never seen a split bolt connector??? Wires all go through the bolt & are squeezed together as you tighten the nut. Ring terminals in a bolt are good too but require more material & more steps.Easier to put them ON a bolt with ring lugs you mean?
I don’t recall seeing limits on the bolts. I may be wrong. I’m not above an error.Which are typically listed for use with only 2 or 3 conductors.
I often agree but I must speak up for Arlington. They produce some excellent products. Their Inbox is the best way to install outdoor receptacles and same with their post receptacle. Their LFNM connectors are the best & easiest to use.i for one appreciate the time and effort of my craft that i've been involved with since the Carter administration , and do not credit manufacturers for making anything about it better
~S~
Most are only listed for two conductors, though there are some listed for three. Pretty rare or none at all listed for more than three I think.I don’t recall seeing limits on the bolts. I may be wrong. I’m not above an error.
and while i'll agree Arlington has manufactured some grand products , i'll also add any level of product review is not available in our trade rags jmellc , they're no more than cheerleaders . One has to solicit the opinions of our fellow tradesfolk in the field ~RJ~I often agree but I must speak up for Arlington. They produce some excellent products. Their Inbox is the best way to install outdoor receptacles and same with their post receptacle. Their LFNM connectors are the best & easiest to use.
and while i'll agree Arlington has manufactured some grand products , i'll also add any level of product review is not available in our trade rags jmellc , they're no more than cheerleaders . One has to solicit the opinions of our fellow tradesfolk in the field ~RJ~
They cheer for whoever spends the most advertising dollars.and while i'll agree Arlington has manufactured some grand products , i'll also add any level of product review is not available in our trade rags jmellc , they're no more than cheerleaders . One has to solicit the opinions of our fellow tradesfolk in the field ~RJ~
You’ve never seen a split bolt connector??? Wires all go through the bolt & are squeezed together as you tighten the nut. Ring terminals in a bolt are good too but require more material & more steps.
You’ve never seen a split bolt failure? I can’t tell you how many huge messes in troughs let alone burned up motor leads I’ve seen caused by split bolts. Medium size plants have been shut down for days because of failures. Motor shops ban their techs from using them.
So how do you torque one to spec? Once torqued how do you maintain it? It’s impossible. The strands also get caught in the threads and are notorious for loose connections. Plus over time they bow out or undo themselves and loosen up. Its maybe OK as a temporary but any permanent installs I’ve seen eventually fail. Half the time I can remove an old split bolt by turning it by hand, no tools. That’s how worthless these things are. So whether it’s Code or not to put far too small gauge wires in one even with the proper sizes I’d rather see wire nuts which if properly installed actually hold up over time over split bolts. I can’t believe UL actually passes them. Should have been delisted years ago because they don’t stay tight. And to think OP is worried about a constant force spring holding.
I seldom if ever seen a split bolt fail on copper conductors. Can't say that for aluminum conductors though (even with split bolt rated for aluminum conductors), and especially improper copper to aluminum connections.You’ve never seen a split bolt failure? I can’t tell you how many huge messes in troughs let alone burned up motor leads I’ve seen caused by split bolts. Medium size plants have been shut down for days because of failures. Motor shops ban their techs from using them.
So how do you torque one to spec? Once torqued how do you maintain it? It’s impossible. The strands also get caught in the threads and are notorious for loose connections. Plus over time they bow out or undo themselves and loosen up. Its maybe OK as a temporary but any permanent installs I’ve seen eventually fail. Half the time I can remove an old split bolt by turning it by hand, no tools. That’s how worthless these things are. So whether it’s Code or not to put far too small gauge wires in one even with the proper sizes I’d rather see wire nuts which if properly installed actually hold up over time over split bolts. I can’t believe UL actually passes them. Should have been delisted years ago because they don’t stay tight. And to think OP is worried about a constant force spring holding.
Forget the split bolt just use the tape only.If you wrap a split bolt with GB tape, that makes a most goodest connection![]()
I have rarely seen split bolts fail. If you saw that many, someone did poor work.You’ve never seen a split bolt failure? I can’t tell you how many huge messes in troughs let alone burned up motor leads I’ve seen caused by split bolts. Medium size plants have been shut down for days because of failures. Motor shops ban their techs from using them.
So how do you torque one to spec? Once torqued how do you maintain it? It’s impossible. The strands also get caught in the threads and are notorious for loose connections. Plus over time they bow out or undo themselves and loosen up. Its maybe OK as a temporary but any permanent installs I’ve seen eventually fail. Half the time I can remove an old split bolt by turning it by hand, no tools. That’s how worthless these things are. So whether it’s Code or not to put far too small gauge wires in one even with the proper sizes I’d rather see wire nuts which if properly installed actually hold up over time over split bolts. I can’t believe UL actually passes them. Should have been delisted years ago because they don’t stay tight. And to think OP is worried about a constant force spring holding.
.Forget the split bolt just use the tape only.
It's what keeps me logging in too jmellcI’ve learned a lot here & hopefully been of some help to others.
oh gawd yes PaulYou’ve never seen a split bolt failure?
Often true. My experience with Arlington has always been good. But just to look at an ad for their product is to see that they are thinking and creating. When I saw an ad for an Inbox, I had been wishing for something like it but no one had it before. I called their office once to tell about a combo electrical/LV data box of theirs, had a few minor issues. The operator apologized that no techs were there but wanted my observations, said their people always appreciated feedback from the field. Is that a good attitude or what?and while i'll agree Arlington has manufactured some grand products , i'll also add any level of product review is not available in our trade rags jmellc , they're no more than cheerleaders . One has to solicit the opinions of our fellow tradesfolk in the field ~RJ~
Are push in connectors as reliable and stable as wire nuts ? I always twist the wires too. I have a new employee who likes using the push in, but I have expressed doubt in them.