PV plan check

Status
Not open for further replies.

cowboyjwc

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Simi Valley, CA
I have a company which keeps submitting plans for a solar system with a battery back up. The plans show a 200 amp main service feeding a 400 amp panel board with a 200 amp main breaker then a 90 amp solar breaker. I've approved a couple, but I really don't like it. I keep telling them that the main service is still the end of the line and you can't have 90 amps going to it. Their claim is that the 400 amp panel is where the 90 amp breaker is and so it's fine.

Comments?
 
I have a company which keeps submitting plans for a solar system with a battery back up. The plans show a 200 amp main service feeding a 400 amp panel board with a 200 amp main breaker then a 90 amp solar breaker. I've approved a couple, but I really don't like it. I keep telling them that the main service is still the end of the line and you can't have 90 amps going to it. Their claim is that the 400 amp panel is where the 90 amp breaker is and so it's fine.

Comments?

If I correctly understand what you described it's totally legit. Of course it must have an ATS so that the system cannot backfeed the grid during an outage.
 
I have a company which keeps submitting plans for a solar system with a battery back up. The plans show a 200 amp main service feeding a 400 amp panel board with a 200 amp main breaker then a 90 amp solar breaker. I've approved a couple, but I really don't like it. I keep telling them that the main service is still the end of the line and you can't have 90 amps going to it. Their claim is that the 400 amp panel is where the 90 amp breaker is and so it's fine.

Comments?
With respect to the service, there is no limit on backfeed onto the service wires as long as it is less than the service size.
But I think you are describing a 200A MCB main service panel. Whatever the bus rating is on that panel will limit what can be connected to it.
If you have only a 200A feeder breaker to the 400A sub panel and the 90A backfeed is into the sub panel, that panel is OK.
The problem, as I expect you see it, is in the main. The 200A feeder breaker must be counted as a 90A backfeed under NEC rules. But if there are no load breakers or other feeder breakers in the 200A panel, just 200A main and 200A feeder, there is no way that the main panel bus can be overloaded.
However, if there are blank spaces in the main panel, some inspectors would argue that it would be possible to connect more than 200A of actual load above and beyond the 200A feeder, and that would force the application of the 120% rule on the main panel.
It is similar to the case where a feeder does nothing but connect a main panel to a PV AC combiner panel. In some code revisions and some inspectors' judgement the 120% rule applies to that feeder since somebody might later cut into the middle of it to supply loads.

I am not concerned at all about the safety of what you describe, as I interpret it.
 
What the code says is that you are only allowed 120% of solar load on a service panel which is calculated as the main breaker + solar breaker, so on a 200 amp panel you would only be allowed 40 amps of solar.

I don' believe that running it to a larger panel first changes that fact. So feeding a 400 amp panel from the 200 amp panel does not change the fact that the main panel is still 200 amps even though the 90 amp solar breaker is in the 400 amp panel.
 
What the code says is that you are only allowed 120% of solar load on a service panel which is calculated as the main breaker + solar breaker, so on a 200 amp panel you would only be allowed 40 amps of solar.

I don' believe that running it to a larger panel first changes that fact. So feeding a 400 amp panel from the 200 amp panel does not change the fact that the main panel is still 200 amps even though the 90 amp solar breaker is in the 400 amp panel.


The main panel is 200A with a 200A main breaker. The PV feedback through the 200A feeder breaker is 90A.
But unless there are other load breakers in the main panel there is nothing that can try to draw more than 200A across any point of the main panel bus.
You will either have 200A in or 90A out. Any intermediate condition will lead to less than 200A on any part of the main panel bus.
This is where different code versions and different applications of common sense and "what if" lead different inspectors to reach different conclusions.
 
What the code says is that you are only allowed 120% of solar load on a service panel which is calculated as the main breaker + solar breaker, so on a 200 amp panel you would only be allowed 40 amps of solar.

I don' believe that running it to a larger panel first changes that fact. So feeding a 400 amp panel from the 200 amp panel does not change the fact that the main panel is still 200 amps even though the 90 amp solar breaker is in the 400 amp panel.

Is there a 200A panel upstream of the 400A one? If so, the solar counts toward the 120% on both of them. If it is (as you stated, or how I interpreted it, anyway) a 200A service (as defined by the size of the transformer or of the size of a disco with OCPD) feeding a 400A panel protected by 200A OCPD, and there are no panels between it and the service entrance, then it's OK.
 
The main panel is 200A with a 200A main breaker. The PV feedback through the 200A feeder breaker is 90A.
But unless there are other load breakers in the main panel there is nothing that can try to draw more than 200A across any point of the main panel bus.
You will either have 200A in or 90A out. Any intermediate condition will lead to less than 200A on any part of the main panel bus.
This is where different code versions and different applications of common sense and "what if" lead different inspectors to reach different conclusions.

In the 2014 NEC, 705.12(D)(2)(3)(b) - the120% rule - does not mention load breakers at all except to say that the busbar needs to be sized to accommodate them, so you can't use the fact that there are no loads in the panel to get past the rule. You can use 705.12(D)(2)(3)(c) to qualify the bus if all the breakers (load and feed, excluding the main breaker) sum to the bus rating or less.

Upsizing the MDP busbar and keeping the main breaker the same is a pretty common way to satisfy the 120% rule, and it is legit.
 
Last edited:
... The plans show a 200 amp main service feeding a 400 amp panel board with a 200 amp main breaker then a 90 amp solar breaker. ...

What the code says is that you are only allowed 120% of solar load on a service panel which is calculated as the main breaker + solar breaker, so on a 200 amp panel you would only be allowed 40 amps of solar.

The use of imprecise terms is inadequate here. In the 2014 code, the 120% rule applies specifically to panelboards. If the 'main service' is just a disconnect or breaker enclosure, it is not a panelboard. If 'service panel' refers to an actual panelboard, then the rule applies. Your language is not making it clear which it is.
 
In the 2014 NEC, 705.12(D)(2)(3)(b) - the120% rule - does not mention load breakers at all except to say that the busbar needs to be sized to accommodate them, so you can't use the fact that there are no loads in the panel to get past the rule. You can use 705.12(D)(2)(3)(c) to qualify the bus if all the breakers (load and feed, excluding the main breaker) sum to the bus rating or less.

Upsizing the MDP busbar and keeping the main breaker the same is a pretty common way to satisfy the 120% rule, and it is legit.
As noted, but in less words, the 120% rule under 2014 is but one option. The option to go with in this scenario, regarding the 200A service disconnecting means bus is (also as mentioned) 705.12(D)(2)(3)(c). Note signage is required.

Also, using one option in the subpanel does not preclude us from using one of the other options upstream.
 
That is not what it says. Look again at the wording of the "120% rule".
705.12(D)(2)(3)(b) says exactly what I said. Where two sources, one utility and the other an inverter, are located at opposite ends of the busbar that contains loads, the sum of 125% of the inverter output circuit current and the rating of the overcurrent device protection the busbar shall not exceed 120% of the ampacity of the busbar.

We only have all in one panels here so the main service panel will always contain loads.
 
705.12(D)(2)(3)(b) says exactly what I said. Where two sources, one utility and the other an inverter, are located at opposite ends of the busbar that contains loads, the sum of 125% of the inverter output circuit current and the rating of the overcurrent device protection the busbar shall not exceed 120% of the ampacity of the busbar.

We only have all in one panels here so the main service panel will always contain loads.
That clarifies things.
Given that the 200A main panel contains loads, you are correct that under any version of the code a 200A panel (bus rating) with a 200A main cannot handle more than 40A of PV backfeed, no matter what path it takes getting there.
 
That clarifies things.
Given that the 200A main panel contains loads, you are correct that under any version of the code a 200A panel (bus rating) with a 200A main cannot handle more than 40A of PV backfeed, no matter what path it takes getting there.
Under 2014 705.12(D)(2)(3)(c) it could if the load breakers sum to less than 160A.
 
Then they would need to submit that (along with photos) at plan check. Correct? Also he trying to add 90 amps of solar.
I would think so... but I'm not the one that specifies what is required for your plan checks. :slaphead:

200A - 90A = 110A :)
 
I would think so... but I'm not the one that specifies what is required for your plan checks. :slaphead:

200A - 90A = 110A :)
Ok if you really read that section it only talks about the location of the solar breaker, also if you have a 200 panel + 90 amps of solar + everything else I'm guessing that 90% of the time you are going to exceed the busbar rating. Now if you go with one of the new solar panels with the 225 amp bus and a 150 amp main, the amount of solar you can put in is almost unlimited, to a point of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top