Running Conduit to ATS. 2" PVCinfinity said:No, but why do you ask? Do you have a specific installation in mind?
If that EMT or RMC was being used for required physical protection of the installed conductors, then substituting sch 40 PVC would be "illegal" for that application. In the eyes of the code, sch 40 PVC and ordinary NM cable are pretty much the same with respect to their resistance to physical damage. Schedule 80 PVC is the only nonmetallic raceway rated for protection against physical damage. I don't know if this relates to your question or not, but here you have it anyhow.EEC said:Is it illegal to install sch 40 pvc in homes in lieu of emt or rgs?
Jump in a ditch in the middle of winter that has some sch 40 PVC running on the bottom, and you can crush it like an egg. At least I can, and I'm not all that heavy. (come to think of it, I don't know if I've ever seen a fat electrician)stickboy1375 said:The only thing i've ever seen break PVC is a car,
I'm one, but I keep my pants pulled up.mdshunk said:come to think of it, I don't know if I've ever seen a fat electrician
EEC said:Is it illegal to install sch 40 pvc in homes in lieu of emt or rgs?
paul said:Check your local building codes. I know that for several years, the city of Seattle did not allow PVC inside building lines. That was the only jurisdiction around here, that I know of, that had that rule.