Very true.There could be 3Ø circuitry involved.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
Very true.There could be 3Ø circuitry involved.
Im missing something in the count. 2-30 amp and 4 20 amp circuits if all single pole would be 12 ccc not 14 right. If the system is single phase, run them as multiwire branch circuits on a 2 pole 30 and 2-2 pole 20s. Now youd be at 6 ccc (neutrals carrying unbalanced load dont count) and only have to derate to 80 percent.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
The system is a 4 wire 3 phase wye 120/208 and I am using
Two 30 amp breakers which are 2 pole............equals 6 ccc
Four 20 amp breakers which are single pole.....equals 8 ccc
for a total of 14. Is that correct?
if i were to use a double pole breaker for the 20 amps and share neutrals I could get down to ten ccc but that still puts me at 50% derating.
For a 208Y/120 volt system a 3 wire MWBC would be considered 3 CCC's.
Yes but if i used a double pole 20 amp breaker instead of two 20 amp single pole breakers...I could share a neutral and have two less CCC's....so that would put me at 12?
Yes but if i used a double pole 20 amp breaker instead of two 20 amp single pole breakers...I could share a neutral and have two less CCC's....so that would put me at 12?
No that's not correct. You got it right earlier. Must have a 4-wire mwbc before the neutral don't count.Yes that's correct, initially you said 10 but either way, 10 or 12 you're still at 50%.![]()
Then make the splice in a neat and workmanlike manner.No problems with splicing inside the panel? I would think that would violate the neat and workmanlike manner.
OK, say a 30 amp double pole breaker is handle tied to a 20 amp single pole breaker on the third phase. Then the 3 ungrounded conductors could be run with a single 30 amp neutral as an MWBC that counts as only 3 CCCs. Any problem with that?
If not, do that twice, and use a double pole 20 amp breaker with a 20 amp neutral for another MWBC. That makes only 9 CCCs, so 70% derating would apply.
Cheers, Wayne
Yeah, it looks like 210.4(C) exception 2 is stricter than necessary. It seems like it should be enough for all ungrounded conductors serving a single piece of equipment to open simultaneously, which the double pole/single pole handle tied together would achieve in the OP's load case.even though that would work electrically I'm not sure it satisfies 210.4(C) ex. 2 because the handle ties do not the breaker a common trip.
No that's not correct. You got it right earlier. Must have a 4-wire mwbc before the neutral don't count.
The system is a 4 wire 3 phase wye 120/208 and I am using
Two 30 amp breakers which are 2 pole............equals 6 ccc
Four 20 amp breakers which are single pole.....equals 8 ccc
for a total of 14. Is that correct?
if i were to use a double pole breaker for the 20 amps and share neutrals I could get down to ten ccc but that still puts me at 50% derating.
You have to count the neutral of a 3-wire circuit on a 208/120 system. While it meets the definition of a multiwire branch circuit, the neutral "discount" only applies to a full boat [310.15(B)(5)(b)].Which part is not correct? If he goes from the original 4-20 amp 2 wire circuits (8 CCC's) to two 3-wire MWBC's he still has the 4 circuits but ends up with 6 CCC's then add the 6 CCC's for the two 30 amp circuits he ends up with 12 CCC's.