Recycling Power Through a Wye-Wye Transformer

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
The device is both load and supplying power?
it absorbs 100 and puts out 95?
or absorbs 5 and puts out 0?
now that I put it on paper it looks even crazier lol
 

Sahib

Senior Member
Location
India
Are you saying a 208 vac bus will flow power to a 480 vac bus?
if the ONLY load (or not) on the 208 bus is the 480 bus

what is the xfmr ratio?

Power flow wil not be reversed in 480v bus but only be reduced consistent with power actually consumed by converter.
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
Power flow wil not be reversed in 480v bus but only be reduced consistent with power actually consumed by converter.

what does that mean?
sometimes the xfmr will see 480 and sometimes 208?
or the sum? Or the difference?

HOW does the converter consume power with no load?
it is the source and the load lol
 

Sahib

Senior Member
Location
India
what does that mean?
sometimes the xfmr will see 480 and sometimes 208?
or the sum? Or the difference?

HOW does the converter consume power with no load?
it is the source and the load lol

For example consider a descending elevator with a regenerative inverter. What happens?
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
clarity

clarity

Not the foggiest idea.

lol
I know you are joking.

for those interested

P = (Vs x Vr)/Z x sin(Vs ang - Vr ang)
P power transferred
Vs sending voltage and phase angle
Vr receiving "
Z between nodes/bus

power flows in direction of V drop
or
Is determined by phase angle
as can be seen if delta angle = 0, sin = 0, so no power flow/transfer
if delta ang = 90, sin = 1, max power transfer
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JFletcher

Senior Member
Location
Williamsburg, VA
Good afternoon,

I work in a company that specializes in 3-phase power converters. Our assembly line electrical test stations need to be able to test our 480V and 208V units, both at 100 A. However, the current reduction at the end of the circuit is only about 5 A. In order to try to save money and electricity, we reroute the remaining 95A back into the test circuit. This means that our power usage for one of these test stations should average maybe just above 5 A multiplied by the test voltage.

Okay. So, the main voltage we run throughout our facility for tests is 480V. We really do not want to run an additional line in order to test our 208V units, or have to run even more lines to test 380V or 400V units as they are developed. Recycling the 480V power is very easy because it can junction directly into the main line. But, we need a transformer to test our 208V units, and as a result we must develop a custom solution to recycle this power while still achieving isolation of the unit under test. That is something I forgot to mention - we need a transformer at each test station in order to ensure all units being tested are isolated from the rest of the building.

Anyway, we have developed a plan to recycle the 208V power in a very unconventional way. We desire to have a custom transformer produced with 480V primary and 480V secondary, as well as 208V taps on both the primary and secondary windings. What we plan on doing for our 208V tests is having 480V power initially enter with relatively high current into the transformer. It would then be transformed into 208V, 100A, and pass through our test unit and test equipment. Once it has passed through all of these, it returns to the input side of the transformer enters the primary winding via the 208V tap. Once the current is steady at 95A entering the primary winding (recall 5A current loss in system), then only a few Amps will be required to sustain the system, entering in the 480V input.

So basically, at t=0:
I_480_in=43A
I_480_out=0A
I_208_in=0A
I_208_out=100A

Then, at t=inf:
I_480_in=3A
I_480_out=0A
I_208_in=95A
I_208_out=100A

Now, the only way this could work is by using Wye connection types on both the primary and the secondary. This would permit two inputs for the transformer, because current and voltage vectors align. This would not be possible for a delta-wye or delta-delta transformer.

So, specs look something like this:

kVA: 75
Qty: 7
Primary: 480V Wye
Secondary: 480V Wye
Taps: 208V Wye on both primary and secondary
Material: Aluminum
Temp Rise: 150

The main issue that we have is that no one is willing to make it for us. We have tried many custom transformer companies, and received answers ranging from, "it's not safe," to, "you don't have enough volume."

Is this in fact an unsafe design? If it is unsafe, why? If it's not unsafe, why won't anyone produce it?

Thanks for the help in advance!!!

Insufficient design specs, parameters impossible to achieve, insufficient bank account, too little lead time on your end to allow mfg, etc. A whole slew of reasons.

Power returns to the source anyway. Returning it to the 480V side at 208V isnt possible, and building a 'return xfmr' to step the 208V back to 480V isnt necessary; the xfmr does that anyway.

It sounds to me like you need 208-480V test @ 100A but only want to pay for 5A worth of power, or are trying to use the xfmr as 95% of your load.

I dont know of any transformer that would allow you to feed it 480V on the high side and then connect a secondary 208V side back to a 208V primary tap. If you really want to try this on a small scale, simply buy a ballast for a street light that has numerous taps on the primary side (120,208,240,277,480) and two secondary taps (120,277) and try an experiment on a much smaller scale. My wag is that it wont work or will go poof in about half a second.

If you could recycle power in the manner you are describing, every xfmr in the country would be wired that way.
 

ggunn

PE (Electrical), NABCEP certified
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Occupation
Consulting Electrical Engineer - Photovoltaic Systems
Insufficient design specs, parameters impossible to achieve, insufficient bank account, too little lead time on your end to allow mfg, etc. A whole slew of reasons.

Power returns to the source anyway. Returning it to the 480V side at 208V isnt possible, and building a 'return xfmr' to step the 208V back to 480V isnt necessary; the xfmr does that anyway.

It sounds to me like you need 208-480V test @ 100A but only want to pay for 5A worth of power, or are trying to use the xfmr as 95% of your load.

I dont know of any transformer that would allow you to feed it 480V on the high side and then connect a secondary 208V side back to a 208V primary tap. If you really want to try this on a small scale, simply buy a ballast for a street light that has numerous taps on the primary side (120,208,240,277,480) and two secondary taps (120,277) and try an experiment on a much smaller scale. My wag is that it wont work or will go poof in about half a second.

If you could recycle power in the manner you are describing, every xfmr in the country would be wired that way.
I confess that I didn't read in detail what the OP is proposing, but what it seems to me from afar is that he is trying to beat the Laws of Thermodynamics. The best you can do is break even, and you cannot break even. There's no way around it.
 

my_mail_hub

Member
Location
Ohio
As I see it, the only way to do what your company is trying do would be to use banks of batteries or use capacitors, to store the excess power that passes through your equipment during the tests. The problem is you get a loss each time you step power down and up. Also if you are forced to convert if from ac to dc and back again. By the time you add in the cost of the necessary equipment, set up, maintenance, etcetera, it seems you'd probably be just as well off to go ahead and count your losses.


Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
 

my_mail_hub

Member
Location
Ohio
The only way I see to do this would be to charge batteries or capacitors during your tests. You would have the complications of stepping up or down voltages or inverting the from ac to dc and back again, etcetera. By the time you add up the costs of equipment, set up, maintenance, and loss of converting power, it doesn't seem worth it.

The other idea I had was to try putting some sort of device on the secondary side of your coil that only let power flow one direction, back to the primary side. In electronics that is probably a cheap part. To prevent the flow of 480v in excess of 100a sounds expensive to me.

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
 

JFletcher

Senior Member
Location
Williamsburg, VA
I confess that I didn't read in detail what the OP is proposing, but what it seems to me from afar is that he is trying to beat the Laws of Thermodynamics. The best you can do is break even, and you cannot break even. There's no way around it.

Even if that isnt his intention, wouldnt any harmonics get amplified or recycled ad infinitum running a distorted secondary waveform(s) back thru the xfmr primary side, providing 95-97% of the amperage?

Looking at the math, he wants ~95-97% of the secondary amperage recycled to the primary side. Perhaps Im failing to understand the nature of the load that would require such a configuration. Motors started across the line could require something similar (huge inrush, little running power), but wouldnt they be self-regulating to the point that at t>0 they arent drawing 100A?

If one needed the ability to test, just for an instant, 100A on the secondary, wouldnt a much smaller xfmr in a more standard configuration work? Heck, a microwave xfmr could probably hold a 100A for a fraction of a second...

What the OP is describing sounds a lot like a short circuit. If the load needs 100A on the secondary, it will draw it. If it needs 5, it takes that. Running 5A thru the load and 95A back to the primary side.... I dont see how that is possible. Either the secondary will draw 100A, or you will have a short circuit from primary to secondary, tho at the same voltage, how would any current move at all? I still think it will do nothing useful or go poof, probably blow the primary windings due to circulating currents or harmonics.

If I'm completely off base Im willing to eat crow on all of this.

I hope the OP comes back to explain more in detail, because w/o it, this thread is pointless conjecture about a hundred variables/sets of info we lack.
 

Besoeker

Senior Member
Location
UK
As I see it, the only way to do what your company is trying do would be to use banks of batteries or use capacitors, to store the excess power that passes through your equipment during the tests. The problem is you get a loss each time you step power down and up. Also if you are forced to convert if from ac to dc and back again. By the time you add in the cost of the necessary equipment, set up, maintenance, etcetera, it seems you'd probably be just as well off to go ahead and count your losses.


Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
You are a new member so welcome to you.
Cutting the losses...............
In the system I mentioned in post #13 you would would be throwing away or wasting the better part of 900kW.
Like the OP's case, it was a test set up which means a one time cost for the hardware and energy recovery multiple times. If you consider that, it isn't so hard to see the economic case for doing something rather than doing nothing.
 

winnie

Senior Member
Location
Springfield, MA, USA
Occupation
Electric motor research
I do hope we've not scared the OP away arguing the fine points of this design.

Ingenieur,

I think in post 48 you described a system that would function for the OP. What you show in post 14 _might_ work if the phase angles were correct, and what you show in post 35 I think has the 240V polarity swapped, but is the essence of what the OP was describing in single phase. IMHO connecting to primary taps is not necessary and makes things more complicated and risky, but is _possible_.

ggunn, my_mail_hub,

There is nothing mysterious or in violation of the laws of thermodynamics to 'recycle' power in a system that is being tested. If you have a device which is intended to _transfer_ power from input to output, only using up a small fraction to internal losses, then to test the device you have to do something with the output power. That output power could be dumped into a dummy load (eg a resistor bank) or it could be put to use.

For purposes of testing devices which transfer power, the best use is to use the output power as a _portion_ of your input power...but as has been noted this might not be trivial, and if you don't 'align' things properly then you 'recirculating dummy load' could easily become a 'bolted fault short circuit'.

To JohnSmith1,

I tried to answer in post 12, but on reading Besoeker and Ingenieur, I think I can expand.

In trying to 'regen' back to your 480V supply bus, you need the power output of your 'device under test' to be in proper phase and voltage alignment with that supply bus in order to get power to flow back to the supply bus. Get this wrong and the wrong amount of power will flow. Get this really wrong and you will be enjoying a fireworks show.

If the device you are testing is similar to a 'line interactive inverter' used in solar power production, then the device under test might itself provide all of the control necessary. You would provide rectified 480V to its input, connect its output to your transformer derived 208V bus, and the device would adjust output voltage and phase angle to supply appropriate power to the 208V bus. But we don't know the details of the device you want to test, and don't know how it will respond to the 208V bus.

As an exercise, I'd suggest designing a system to test a standard 480V delta to 208V wye transformer in place of your power converter.

I'll do the first step of the exercise: consider another standard 480V delta to 208V wye transformer, connected in parallel on both primary and secondary to the transformer that you want to test. As you can see, if the transformer is connected properly there will be _no_ current flow (other than magnetizing current on the primary side), and if the transformers are not paralleled correctly you will see very large current flows.

The next step in this exercise is to figure out what you would need to do in order to get controlled amounts of power to flow from 480V to 208V through one transformer, and from 208V to 480V on the other. Figure out this control and you are well on the way to figuring out the system you want to build.

To close I will repeat something: don't think of the direction of power flow as going from 'primary' to 'secondary'. For your application 'primary' will always be your power supply bus (the 480V), and power will happily flow from secondary to primary. You won't need 'primary taps' to regenerate power back to your bus.

-Jon
 

Ingenieur

Senior Member
Location
Earth
As I and others have said
do not mix voltages on the primary, risk or short or device damage, or both
possibly a 208-480 inverter to 480 bus xfmr may do it
Or you need a load, preferably storage (battery, caps, etc)
invert that back into the 480 bus

The concept of loading the device to 100% and putting the output back onto the supply grid is common and sound
imho your method is not

have you done a cost analysis: wasting the power vs recover?
using it for heating (or cooling) during test cycle, therefore reducing consumption by the normally used hvac equipment?

I suggest you consult with an ee or a firm that mfgs ss power test equipment
 
Last edited:

Phil Corso

Senior Member
Gentlepeople...

I believe most of of you have overlooked the three basic principles (or tenets) of power transmission. Here they are:

1) Power is transmitted if the two "Bus-Angles" differ.
2) VAr is transmitted if the two "Bus-Voltage" magnitudes differ.
3) Power and VAr are transmitted simultaneously, if both Magnitude and Angle, differ.

Regards, Phil Corso
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top