#
Are you familiar with line commutated inverters?
Are you saying a 208 vac bus will flow power to a 480 vac bus?
if the ONLY load (or not) on the 208 bus is the 480 bus
what is the xfmr ratio?
Power flow wil not be reversed in 480v bus but only be reduced consistent with power actually consumed by converter.
what does that mean?
sometimes the xfmr will see 480 and sometimes 208?
or the sum? Or the difference?
HOW does the converter consume power with no load?
it is the source and the load lol
For example consider a descending elevator with a regenerative inverter. What happens?
Not the foggiest idea.are you familier with the concept of power flow?
Not the foggiest idea.
Good afternoon,
I work in a company that specializes in 3-phase power converters. Our assembly line electrical test stations need to be able to test our 480V and 208V units, both at 100 A. However, the current reduction at the end of the circuit is only about 5 A. In order to try to save money and electricity, we reroute the remaining 95A back into the test circuit. This means that our power usage for one of these test stations should average maybe just above 5 A multiplied by the test voltage.
Okay. So, the main voltage we run throughout our facility for tests is 480V. We really do not want to run an additional line in order to test our 208V units, or have to run even more lines to test 380V or 400V units as they are developed. Recycling the 480V power is very easy because it can junction directly into the main line. But, we need a transformer to test our 208V units, and as a result we must develop a custom solution to recycle this power while still achieving isolation of the unit under test. That is something I forgot to mention - we need a transformer at each test station in order to ensure all units being tested are isolated from the rest of the building.
Anyway, we have developed a plan to recycle the 208V power in a very unconventional way. We desire to have a custom transformer produced with 480V primary and 480V secondary, as well as 208V taps on both the primary and secondary windings. What we plan on doing for our 208V tests is having 480V power initially enter with relatively high current into the transformer. It would then be transformed into 208V, 100A, and pass through our test unit and test equipment. Once it has passed through all of these, it returns to the input side of the transformer enters the primary winding via the 208V tap. Once the current is steady at 95A entering the primary winding (recall 5A current loss in system), then only a few Amps will be required to sustain the system, entering in the 480V input.
So basically, at t=0:
I_480_in=43A
I_480_out=0A
I_208_in=0A
I_208_out=100A
Then, at t=inf:
I_480_in=3A
I_480_out=0A
I_208_in=95A
I_208_out=100A
Now, the only way this could work is by using Wye connection types on both the primary and the secondary. This would permit two inputs for the transformer, because current and voltage vectors align. This would not be possible for a delta-wye or delta-delta transformer.
So, specs look something like this:
kVA: 75
Qty: 7
Primary: 480V Wye
Secondary: 480V Wye
Taps: 208V Wye on both primary and secondary
Material: Aluminum
Temp Rise: 150
The main issue that we have is that no one is willing to make it for us. We have tried many custom transformer companies, and received answers ranging from, "it's not safe," to, "you don't have enough volume."
Is this in fact an unsafe design? If it is unsafe, why? If it's not unsafe, why won't anyone produce it?
Thanks for the help in advance!!!
I confess that I didn't read in detail what the OP is proposing, but what it seems to me from afar is that he is trying to beat the Laws of Thermodynamics. The best you can do is break even, and you cannot break even. There's no way around it.Insufficient design specs, parameters impossible to achieve, insufficient bank account, too little lead time on your end to allow mfg, etc. A whole slew of reasons.
Power returns to the source anyway. Returning it to the 480V side at 208V isnt possible, and building a 'return xfmr' to step the 208V back to 480V isnt necessary; the xfmr does that anyway.
It sounds to me like you need 208-480V test @ 100A but only want to pay for 5A worth of power, or are trying to use the xfmr as 95% of your load.
I dont know of any transformer that would allow you to feed it 480V on the high side and then connect a secondary 208V side back to a 208V primary tap. If you really want to try this on a small scale, simply buy a ballast for a street light that has numerous taps on the primary side (120,208,240,277,480) and two secondary taps (120,277) and try an experiment on a much smaller scale. My wag is that it wont work or will go poof in about half a second.
If you could recycle power in the manner you are describing, every xfmr in the country would be wired that way.
I confess that I didn't read in detail what the OP is proposing, but what it seems to me from afar is that he is trying to beat the Laws of Thermodynamics. The best you can do is break even, and you cannot break even. There's no way around it.
You are a new member so welcome to you.As I see it, the only way to do what your company is trying do would be to use banks of batteries or use capacitors, to store the excess power that passes through your equipment during the tests. The problem is you get a loss each time you step power down and up. Also if you are forced to convert if from ac to dc and back again. By the time you add in the cost of the necessary equipment, set up, maintenance, etcetera, it seems you'd probably be just as well off to go ahead and count your losses.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
I suggest you consult with an ee..