Re: Residential Grade Material
cs409: not to prolong this argument, but your original question did not merely ask me if i was asserting that there was a weak point, it implied that it was not true with the inclusion of the reference to modular panels. That is why I responded again. Super neat looks great, (tastes) great, less filling on the pocket book.
I still haven't got an answer from a super neater about compromising a stud or two or... when large knots or other defects, or let braces, or other defects fall on the drill line. I do not think that neat is more important than structure. I was always more worried about turning plates and studs into swiss cheese after all the holes are drilled for large panels and sub panels.
I do not think that there is ONE right way. I think speed and efficiency need to be balanced against safe and secure wiring, the codes being the MINIMUM. I think it's fine that there are a variety of styles of wiring for contractors/homeowners to pick from.
The contractor knows if he is getting his money's worth from his subs, but does the homeowner? Does he know if it's quality or speed that is the defining methodology of the electrical subcontractor. I always added in time for holding the owners hands with their pet ideas for what they wanted. Clarified that some personal choices might be resale oddities. This is not true for slam dunk/bare bones/tract bids.
Architects hardly give a second thought to some custom home electrical plusses. I have seen super custom designs with marginal lighting, as if the architect was afraid that any electrical extra would compromise the budget for their great design. A few minutes with the future owner can add nicely to the pocket book and turn a two day rough into much more.
sorry for the length, paul
cs409: not to prolong this argument, but your original question did not merely ask me if i was asserting that there was a weak point, it implied that it was not true with the inclusion of the reference to modular panels. That is why I responded again. Super neat looks great, (tastes) great, less filling on the pocket book.
I still haven't got an answer from a super neater about compromising a stud or two or... when large knots or other defects, or let braces, or other defects fall on the drill line. I do not think that neat is more important than structure. I was always more worried about turning plates and studs into swiss cheese after all the holes are drilled for large panels and sub panels.
I do not think that there is ONE right way. I think speed and efficiency need to be balanced against safe and secure wiring, the codes being the MINIMUM. I think it's fine that there are a variety of styles of wiring for contractors/homeowners to pick from.
The contractor knows if he is getting his money's worth from his subs, but does the homeowner? Does he know if it's quality or speed that is the defining methodology of the electrical subcontractor. I always added in time for holding the owners hands with their pet ideas for what they wanted. Clarified that some personal choices might be resale oddities. This is not true for slam dunk/bare bones/tract bids.
Architects hardly give a second thought to some custom home electrical plusses. I have seen super custom designs with marginal lighting, as if the architect was afraid that any electrical extra would compromise the budget for their great design. A few minutes with the future owner can add nicely to the pocket book and turn a two day rough into much more.
sorry for the length, paul