I have come across two situations in residential wiring when using nonmetallic sheathed cable (romex) that have me concerned if they violate NEC Article 300.3(B) - see bottom of question for NEC article content. I would like a better understanding how Romex cable is used/installed for residential wiring in relation to Article 300.3(B). There is also concern about effective ground fault current paths, NEC article 250.4(A)(5), which could be a violation as well.
Installation #1
A bathroom will have a combination heat/vent/light appliance installed on a 120-volt/15-amp dedicated circuit. A nonmetallic box will be used for the switches and the appliance has a metal enclosure of its own for wiring. The 120-volt line will run from the panel to the switch box then to the appliance. Five conductors are needed from the switch box to the appliance - one common white neutral conductor, and four switch-loops for the heater, fan, 100-watt light, and 7-watt night light. An equipment ground wire will be included. By NEC code, can one 14/3 and one 14/2 Romex cable be used from the switch box to the appliance (no conduit) for the five conductors needed; or must five-single conductors be installed in conduit for the appliance?
Installation #2
A ceiling fan with light will be installed on a 120-volt/15amp lighting circuit. The 120-volt line will run from the panel to a double-gang nonmetallic box containing two 3-way switches, then the wiring will run to another double-gang nonmetallic box containing two more 3-way switches, then the wiring will continue and end at the ceiling fan with light.
The conductors needed between the two double-gang boxes are four travelers and one common white neutral conductor - an equipment ground wire is included. By NEC code can on 14/3 and one 14/2 Romex cable be used between the two double-gang boxes to provide the five conductors needed; or must five-single conductors be installed in conduit between the two double-gang boxes?
Does the National Electric Cable prohibit the use of Romex cables being used in this manner in residential wiring and is there an issue with an effective ground-fault path when two Romex cables, from the same circuit, are used in this manner? SHould a ground-fault occur would the two paths limit the induced ground-fault currents and thus have the potential not to open the overcurrent device?
NEC Article 300.3 (B)
-States all conductors of the same circuit shall be contained within the same raveway, trench, cable, etc. because of electrical theory; that is, the cancelling of currents, to reduce inductive heating, and to avoid increases in overall circuit impedance.
Two other NEC Articles which relate to conductors of the same circuit are NEC Article 300.5(I) and NEC Article 300.2 (A) + (B). Article 300.5 (I) deals with underground installations and 300.20(A)+(B) deals with Induced currents in ferrous Metal Enclosures and Ferrous Metal Raceways. Each of these articles lends support to Article 300.5(B) and give insight and reason.
I am an electrical vocation instructor's aide and have had my Journeyman's Electrician license for less than a year. I care about the quality of educational knowledge I present to the students I instruct. I want my students to care more about installing the most efficient and safest electrical systems that reduce the threat of fires and hazards of electrical shock than to merely build an electricl circuit that works. I am looking for serious responses and it is my hope that someone can help me understand these particular problems more clearly. Thank you for your help.
Installation #1
A bathroom will have a combination heat/vent/light appliance installed on a 120-volt/15-amp dedicated circuit. A nonmetallic box will be used for the switches and the appliance has a metal enclosure of its own for wiring. The 120-volt line will run from the panel to the switch box then to the appliance. Five conductors are needed from the switch box to the appliance - one common white neutral conductor, and four switch-loops for the heater, fan, 100-watt light, and 7-watt night light. An equipment ground wire will be included. By NEC code, can one 14/3 and one 14/2 Romex cable be used from the switch box to the appliance (no conduit) for the five conductors needed; or must five-single conductors be installed in conduit for the appliance?
Installation #2
A ceiling fan with light will be installed on a 120-volt/15amp lighting circuit. The 120-volt line will run from the panel to a double-gang nonmetallic box containing two 3-way switches, then the wiring will run to another double-gang nonmetallic box containing two more 3-way switches, then the wiring will continue and end at the ceiling fan with light.
The conductors needed between the two double-gang boxes are four travelers and one common white neutral conductor - an equipment ground wire is included. By NEC code can on 14/3 and one 14/2 Romex cable be used between the two double-gang boxes to provide the five conductors needed; or must five-single conductors be installed in conduit between the two double-gang boxes?
Does the National Electric Cable prohibit the use of Romex cables being used in this manner in residential wiring and is there an issue with an effective ground-fault path when two Romex cables, from the same circuit, are used in this manner? SHould a ground-fault occur would the two paths limit the induced ground-fault currents and thus have the potential not to open the overcurrent device?
NEC Article 300.3 (B)
-States all conductors of the same circuit shall be contained within the same raveway, trench, cable, etc. because of electrical theory; that is, the cancelling of currents, to reduce inductive heating, and to avoid increases in overall circuit impedance.
Two other NEC Articles which relate to conductors of the same circuit are NEC Article 300.5(I) and NEC Article 300.2 (A) + (B). Article 300.5 (I) deals with underground installations and 300.20(A)+(B) deals with Induced currents in ferrous Metal Enclosures and Ferrous Metal Raceways. Each of these articles lends support to Article 300.5(B) and give insight and reason.
I am an electrical vocation instructor's aide and have had my Journeyman's Electrician license for less than a year. I care about the quality of educational knowledge I present to the students I instruct. I want my students to care more about installing the most efficient and safest electrical systems that reduce the threat of fires and hazards of electrical shock than to merely build an electricl circuit that works. I am looking for serious responses and it is my hope that someone can help me understand these particular problems more clearly. Thank you for your help.