I agree.Originally posted by infinity:
Not OK.
Why is this considered such a "burn them at the stake" violation? Yes, it's code, yes, I do it, but it always kinda makes me giggle a little when someone brings it up.( am I the only guy left who marks white wires with black tape when used for hots ?!)
Please explain in more detailNow you have part of one circuit with an OCPD of 40 amps. You need to trace the entire circuit(s) out and find where they are connected together. Putting the two circuits one the same phase effectively doubles the ampacity of the OCPD protecting it. Somewhere along that #12 wire it may be protected by 40 amps of OCPD.
This is confusing to me. Are you saying if breaker 1 (just for discussion) is on, breaker 2 has 120 volts on it fed from breaker 1 and vice versa, but breaker 1 does not energize some devices that breaker 2 does energize (and vice versa)?Originally posted by 2_BEARS:
Unacceptable. Turns out that the original suspect circuit is indeed being fed twice BUTBoth of the breakers also heat up some other devices as well, now I can't just disconnect one of the breakers
![]()
I regarded that as an impossibility, so I read that as saying that the combined circuit is larger than 2-Bears would like. Or, "some other devices" could mean a circuit required to be separate, such as required in 210.11(C).Originally posted by hardworkingstiff:
This is confusing to me. Are you saying if breaker 1 (just for discussion) is on, breaker 2 has 120 volts on it fed from breaker 1 and vice versa, but breaker 1 does not energize some devices that breaker 2 does energize (and vice versa)?Originally posted by 2_BEARS:
Unacceptable. Turns out that the original suspect circuit is indeed being fed twice BUTBoth of the breakers also heat up some other devices as well, now I can't just disconnect one of the breakers
![]()
Originally posted by Jhr:
Please explain in more detailPutting the two circuits one the same phase effectively doubles the ampacity of the OCPD protecting it. Somewhere along that #12 wire it may be protected by 40 amps of OCPD.![]()
that is a scarry point, Jim. Makes one wonder how often this situation might exists. I encountered it one time in a commercial office building (1 circuit, two breakers, same phase)attempting to turn off a circuit by turning off 1 breaker at a time. Looked at a lot of panelboards before we discovered what was happpening. (circuit tracer was going nuts)What gets scarry is that this was a 50-50 chance of you never even knowing there was a problem had they been on same leg.
Is this your theory, because a 20amp Brkr. will trip after 20amps is exceded, where do you come up with 40amps, and how do know that the current divides at the center. IMO this is still a 20amp circuit that will trip when 20amps is excededPersonally I've always like this concept.