SER cable in LB

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure. We may be thinking about two different scenarios so, I'll try to re-explain my installation.
  • SEU cable is used out of the top of the meter pan to a service head.
  • PVC is used out of the bottom of the meter pan, to an LB and then stubbed into a basement where a main breaker panel is installed in close proximity to the PVC stub.
  • Approx. 4' or 5' of the sheathing of the SE cable is stripped off
  • A squeeze connector is installed and tightened down on the SE cable
  • A PVC female adapter is screwed onto the squeeze connector
  • The conduit end of the female adapter is glued and slid onto the PVC stub bringing the stripped end of the SE cable into the LB and eventually into the meter pan
  • A squeeze connector is used on the unstripped SE cable end in order to enter the cabinet
  • I haven't penetrated any ceilings and the total run is less than 10'

Does that clear things up and make my question understandable ?

How is the squeeze connector grounded?
 
Really Rob ??? Are we going to get that nit picky :slaphead: What are the chances of that squeeze connector becomming energized ? That's got to be a shot in a million !!!;)

Why do you think that retro boxes had the screws sunk into the side of the box

ARL-F101-2T.jpg
 
How is the squeeze connector grounded?
Pardon my ignorance, is the connector pictured below what is being referred to? If so, I assume from the description that the setscrew side is inside the cabinet, with the male threads sticking out. So then wouldn't you put locknut on, securing it and grounding it? The PVC female adapter can then go onto the remaining threads.

Cheers, Wayne
 

Attachments

  • 30243-ProductImageURL.jpg
    30243-ProductImageURL.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 0
Pardon my ignorance, is the connector pictured below what is being referred to? If so, I assume from the description that the setscrew side is inside the cabinet, with the male threads sticking out. So then wouldn't you put locknut on, securing it and grounding it? The PVC female adapter can then go onto the remaining threads.

Cheers, Wayne

The connector is similar to what you are showing but there is a piece of pvc coming out of the panel with a fitting that is a pvc coupling on one end and has threads on the other end -- the connector screws into the threads

p_1000100870.jpg





prod_3210436628
 
That's exactly what came to mind and those screws would be in the box, not squeezing down on unprotected SEC's. ;)
when was the last time you squeezed down so hard on and SEU squeeze connector that it pierced the jacket cut through the braid and cut into the XHHW insulation and shorted to the power wires .
 
The connector is similar to what you are showing but there is a piece of pvc coming out of the panel with a fitting that is a pvc coupling on one end and has threads on the other end -- the connector screws into the threads
Thanks, that clarifies it.

It also means I retract my comments about the setup being compliant with 312.5, as the stripped end of the SE isn't secured to the meter pan.

Suppose instead a squeeze connector is used at the bottom of the meter pan, with the male threads on the outside of the meter pan. The male threads get a locknut and then a PVC female adapter, then a short PVC sleeve including an LB. That should satisfy 312.5 at the meter pan.

Would there be any need to secure the SE cable where it emerges from the far end of the sleeve? If not, that would eliminate the isolated metal connector that needs bonding.

Cheers, Wayne
 
Thanks, that clarifies it.

It also means I retract my comments about the setup being compliant with 312.5, as the stripped end of the SE isn't secured to the meter pan.

Suppose instead a squeeze connector is used at the bottom of the meter pan, with the male threads on the outside of the meter pan. The male threads get a locknut and then a PVC female adapter, then a short PVC sleeve including an LB. That should satisfy 312.5 at the meter pan.

Would there be any need to secure the SE cable where it emerges from the far end of the sleeve? If not, that would eliminate the isolated metal connector that needs bonding.

Cheers, Wayne
In most cases there's hardly enough room in the meter pan to begin with. Installing it upside down would not only give you less room but would not be in accordance with mfr's recommendations. Good idea though.:huh:
 
I just called this on an inspection yesterday. The EC had turned a panel from one side of the wall to the other and brought the cables into the enclosure through a 2" PVC sleeve. The sheath did not pass all of the way through the sleeve, so I wrote the correction.
 
Would there be any need to secure the SE cable where it emerges from the far end of the sleeve? If not, that would eliminate the isolated metal connector that needs bonding.

Cheers, Wayne

There is no need to secure the cable with a connector at the outer end of the pvc. 312.5 is clear in my mind on that. You just need a bushing and a staple 12" from where the cable exits the raceway (sleeve).
 
There is no need to secure the cable with a connector at the outer end of the pvc. 312.5 is clear in my mind on that. You just need a bushing and a staple 12" from where the cable exits the raceway (sleeve).
Also, let's remember the OP was asking about SER cable and not SEU as in my scenario.
 
That has noting to do with it at all.
It has everything to do with my response to this one from Infinity
That's exactly what came to mind and those screws would be in the box, not squeezing down on unprotected SEC's.
Sorry If I didn't make that clear. As to whether the squeeze connector should be grounded, yes I suppose it should. However, the chances of that connector ever becoming energized while sitting between floor joists or just inside a rim joist and just above a sill plate are a shot in a million. If I ever failed an inspection for that you'd here my screams all the way up there in Boston.;)
 
It has everything to do with my response to this one from Infinity Sorry If I didn't make that clear. As to whether the squeeze connector should be grounded, yes I suppose it should. However, the chances of that connector ever becoming energized while sitting between floor joists or just inside a rim joist and just above a sill plate are a shot in a million. If I ever failed an inspection for that you'd here my screams all the way up there in Boston.;)

IMO the NEC requires the connector to be grounded, regardless of the long shot, regardless of rim joists or how loud you would scream. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top