letgomywago
Senior Member
- Location
- Washington state and Oregon coast
- Occupation
- residential electrician
Never mind it looks like they are combos the yellow test button threw meThose look like branch feeder to me
Never mind it looks like they are combos the yellow test button threw meThose look like branch feeder to me
Didn't you say you have a dual function for the garage?
But plenty of others have brand new out of the box equipment that trips the devices
The AFCI manufactures are trying to tell us that they know every normal arc signature of every piece of equipment that has been produced in teh past and that will be produced within the life of the AFCI...not even remotely possible.
What type of Saw so you have. I want to go and buy one that won't trip those older afcis.
A proposed class action alleges a certain type of circuit breaker made by Siemens Industry is defective in that it is unable to distinguish between harmless and dangerous electrical arcs.
This is only the beginning of this Class Action lawsuit, during the Discovery Phase, more information will be flushed out. Pardon the Pun !Can any AFCI distinguish between harmless and dangerous electrical arcs??
How long have you suffered Zone 1 Elevated Indoor Radon exposure?Wardcraft. Custom built, in factory, stick framed. Not a mobile or the typical mfg home with cheap donkey poop everywhere.
Hello! Siemens has been named in a lawsuit claiming that its AFCIs have excessive “nuisance tripping.” Siemens very strongly disputes these allegations. Siemens stands by its products, which work as intended and fully meet all applicable UL specifications (which include tripping standards). Notably, there is no claim whatsoever in the lawsuit that Siemens’ AFCIs fail to trip during arcing, or are otherwise dangerous or unsafe. We cannot comment further in light of pending litigation. Siemens offers easily-accessible technical support to electricians and customers with questions about its AFCI products, including tripping. We will continue to support purchasers, as always, in identifying and addressing the actual cause of any tripping issues. If support is needed, please call us! 1-800-333-7421A proposed class action alleges a certain type of circuit breaker made by Siemens Industry is defective in that it is unable to distinguish between harmless and dangerous electrical arcs.
Hello! Siemens has been named in a lawsuit claiming that its AFCIs have excessive “nuisance tripping.” Siemens very strongly disputes these allegations. Siemens stands by its products, which work as intended and fully meet all applicable UL specifications (which include tripping standards). Notably, there is no claim whatsoever in the lawsuit that Siemens’ AFCIs fail to trip during arcing, or are otherwise dangerous or unsafe. We cannot comment further in light of pending litigation. Siemens offers easily-accessible technical support to electricians and customers with questions about its AFCI products, including tripping. We will continue to support purchasers, as always, in identifying and addressing the actual cause of any tripping issues. If support is needed, please call us! 1-800-333-7421
The label suggests positions 7&8 for the combination (Bath receptacles). The panel has them in positions (per usual practice, odd on the left, even on the right) 6&8. The panel is not factory stamped, so I don't think there is anything wrong, but are the neutrals possibly not matched to the correct breakers?
which work as intended and fully meet all applicable UL specifications (which include tripping standards).
I wonder if he has a panel full of AFCIs in his own house.Wow they've heard about this enough to have an employee make an account and respond haha. Who's going to do this with the other brands now?
If a lawsuit like this was successful the evidence showing their lack of function could be reviewed by those who adopt the NEC for each state. Those boards always was written studies a court case showing that their required use is improper would make a difference. This is how the TIA for gfci on ACs happened in conjunction with the exceptionally large number of deaths and hospitalizations got this added. Unfortunately this is how things work.Whats the end game here? Code would still require them either way so then what?
Siemens could settle, then discontinue AFCI breakers or they add the cost of the lawsuit to the re-design of the breaker and now we'll have even more overpriced AFCI's.
We'd have to use Classified AFCI's? But no UL wont approve that.
I feel for peoples frustration with AFCI's but, I am genuinely confused how this benefits anyone but lawyers.