Splicing in a residential panelboard.

Status
Not open for further replies.

mjc1060

Senior Member
I am adding a sub-panel in a residence. The existing panelboard(100A 240V) has no spares and I need a circuit for a sump pump(20A 120V). My question is can I remove two circuits from the existing panelboard and insert a two pole 100A to feed the sub panel. Since the two circuits I will be removing are in EMT conduit with other circuits I would like to splice them in the existing panel and pick up the OCPD in the new sub-panel. The practice in my jurisdiction is to never splice in a cabinet containing a panelboard but I can't find a code reference that prohibits this. Where I am working the 2005 NEC is used. Can anyone shed some light on this. Is the no splicing rule in a panel board real or myth?:?
 
I am adding a sub-panel in a residence. The existing panelboard(100A 240V) has no spares and I need a circuit for a sump pump(20A 120V). My question is can I remove two circuits from the existing panelboard and insert a two pole 100A to feed the sub panel. Since the two circuits I will be removing are in EMT conduit with other circuits I would like to splice them in the existing panel and pick up the OCPD in the new sub-panel. The practice in my jurisdiction is to never splice in a cabinet containing a panelboard but I can't find a code reference that prohibits this. Where I am working the 2005 NEC is used. Can anyone shed some light on this. Is the no splicing rule in a panel board real or myth?:?

Where will you find a 100A branch CB to fit in a 100A panel?
 
Where will you find a 100A branch CB to fit in a 100A panel?
Pretty much anywhere that sells breakers. 100A 2pole is the same as 15A 2pole in terms of fit and availability. Personally, I don't see the need. I'd do a 50 or 60 amp sub.
 
I agree with the others that there is no problem splicing in the existing panel or finding a 2-pole 100 amp breaker. Do you really need 100 amps for the added panel if all you are adding is 1 20 amp circuit? If you are just going to be moving a couple existing 20 amp circuits to the new panel why not feed it will 40 amps? 100 amps seems overkill.
 
I agree with the others that there is no problem splicing in the existing panel or finding a 2-pole 100 amp breaker. Do you really need 100 amps for the added panel if all you are adding is 1 20 amp circuit? If you are just going to be moving a couple existing 20 amp circuits to the new panel why not feed it will 40 amps? 100 amps seems overkill.

I would usually feed with 60 amps, as most breaker lines a 60 is same price as a 15 or 20, but get into 70 amp or larger and the price usually goes up. 60 allows for a fair amount of additional circuits down the road without needing to upgrade the feeder again. I also usually put large enough nipple between panels that 100 amp conductor can be easily installed at later time if needed.
 
There's no reason you can't splice in a breaker cabinet as long as you have the trough space. If you're working with an old Federal panel that's crammed with wires to begin with you shouldn't splice there. Also, if you're installing a 100A sub-panel and using SE cable you'll have to derate to 90 amps. You'll also have to figure out how you're going to terminate the ground and neutral wires of the SE cable in a panel that's already packed with wires. IMHO, I would do as kwired suggested and install a 60 amp sub-panel. Less hassle and much easier to terminate.
 
Also, if you're installing a 100A sub-panel and using SE cable you'll have to derate to 90 amps.

That is entirely dependent on what size the conductors are. It is true many suppliers maybe only have demand for certain sizes and you may find yourself in that situation with what is readily available.
 
There is no code or other reason not to splice in an electrical cabinet.


See 312.8 for details.

Can you use it for a pull box? If I come out of the panel to say a switch box and go back the same pipe through the panel and up a different pipe with a switch leg to a fixture.
 
Can you use it for a pull box? If I come out of the panel to say a switch box and go back the same pipe through the panel and up a different pipe with a switch leg to a fixture.
Yes. You could even have circuits that do not originate from that panel pass through it, may be a bad design choice but is not a NEC violation either.
 
Yes. You could even have circuits that do not originate from that panel pass through it, may be a bad design choice but is not a NEC violation either.

OOOOOH I hate that method. You are looking for trouble. Bad Idea althoug legitimate.
 
Yes. You could even have circuits that do not originate from that panel pass through it, may be a bad design choice but is not a NEC violation either.
I was always under the impression that you couldn't (or should I say "shouldn't") use the breaker cabinet as a raceway even though there's no NEC section citing that.
 
For the life of me I have never understood why people think it is 'bad practice' to install wiring in an electrical enclosure.

Wireless is the future!

Seriously... the reference was to passing wires through the enclosure that aren't terminated in the enclosure. Bad practice. Makes a panel change later more difficult.
 
Wireless is the future!

Seriously... the reference was to passing wires through the enclosure that aren't terminated in the enclosure. Bad practice. Makes a panel change later more difficult.
So does recessing the panel in a wall or entering with cables or raceways from multiple sides.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top