I disagree... provided you are referring to a 3-pc.-threaded coupling as an Erickson coupling....a threadless connector ... would be more secure than a Erickson coupling.
I disagree... provided you are referring to a 3-pc.-threaded coupling as an Erickson coupling....a threadless connector ... would be more secure than a Erickson coupling.
I disagree... provided you are referring to a 3-pc.-threaded coupling as an Erickson coupling.
How did you "bust" an erickson?I am and we will just agree to disagree. I have not busted a single threadless connector. E-Coupling,more than I can remember.![]()
Here is CMP 9s view on this issue. The proposal was for the 2008 code.
That's just great! Now, where can I find a handsome saw? :grin:
How did you "bust" an erickson?
Here ya go Larry, I found you one. Read the first paragraph of the link.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.capecodweathervanecompany.com/images/LgProductPhotos/252.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.capecodweathervanecompany.com/Carpenter_Saw_Weathervane.htm&usg=__bZ8acW_V9MWZL1kv4_zqhktgUgw=&h=412&w=299&sz=20&hl=en&start=9&tbnid=LfIFLFgJcFQBgM:&tbnh=125&tbnw=91&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dhandsom%2Bsaw%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Den-us%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1
Malleable iron?The female (nut) portion of the coupling will split with very little stress making the coupling assembly as effective as a duct tape joint.