kwired
Electron manager
- Location
- NE Nebraska
- Occupation
- EC
OP did mention the 1 volt to earth. Did not mention where in relation to the pool this "earth measurement point" was. Considering the intended purpose of using equipotential bonding in and around a pool, this measurement needs to be taken very near the pool. Any measurement to earth away from the pool doesn't mean much and some voltage reading to a remote point may actually be considered normal.Let ,e try to clarify that a little:
He said
The 1V measured between the pool light and local earth went away.
Nothing about a pool subpanel light. I am assuming that the "120V light" is a pool light, not a light at the panel.
Anyway, in the absence of any other information, I would first consider that the EGC is effectively bonded to the light shell in the water, but that there is a tingling due to the voltage difference between the water and the earth around the pool.
Two ways to approach that:
1. Figure out why the EGC is 1V off local ground (there are any number of code compliant reasons for that given neutral current flowing in/out of the GES somewhere, not necessarily at the house in question. Fix that somehow.
2. Figure out why the local earth around the pool is not part of the equipotential grid connected to the EGC.
The second one is probably more valuable in the long run.
The information about 1V --> 3.5V with some combination of bond lifts is more unclear and possibly not relevant to this problem except to the extent that it affects point #2 above.
Does that fit with your understanding of the OP's posts?
Would seem to me the most important measurement here is likely from the light in question to either the water, or other conductive objects nearby (in or out of the water) like say a exit ladder or structure for diving platforms, lifeguard stands, and the like.