No 210.5 is about the grounded conductor.Originally posted by kpepin:
check Art 210.5.
Your supposed to ID all ungrounded conductors according to the phase. I know most people don't do it and most inspectors don't check it.
Originally posted by peter d:
Bob,
A military branch circuit?LOL
![]()
I had already caught that.
That is what happens when your watching the news and typing at the same time.![]()
The section you want I think is 210.4(D). Please read it carefully as it states that only multiwire circuits need to have the ungrounded conductors identified.Originally posted by kpepin:
check Art 210.5.
Your supposed to ID all ungrounded conductors according to the phase. I know most people don't do it and most inspectors don't check it.
True enough a house probable won't have more than one nominal voltage system but there are other types of buildings that require electricity.210.5 Identification for Branch Circuits.
(A) Grounded Conductor. The grounded conductor of a branch circuit shall be identified in accordance with 200.6.
(B) Equipment Grounding Conductor. The equipment
grounding conductor shall be identified in accordance with 250.119.
(C) Ungrounded Conductors . Where the premises wiring system has branch circuits supplied from more than one nominal voltage system, each ungrounded conductor of a branch circuit, where accessible, shall be identified by system. The means of identification shall be permitted to be by separate color coding, marking tape, tagging, or other approved means and shall be permanently posted at each branch-circuit panelboard or similar branch-circuit distribution equipment.
What do you mean by that remark?Originally posted by kpepin:
[True enough a house probable won't have more than one nominal voltage system but there are other types of buildings that require electricity.
Sorry I assumed the 2002 NEC.Originally posted by kpepin:
True enough a house probable won't have more than one nominal voltage system but there are other types of buildings that require electricity.
More power to youOriginally posted by kpepin:
I always try to slowly incorporate any code changes as soon as the new code is released. I can't recall any instance where the new code is less strict than the previous. In fact, I think a lot of town in my area are still using the 1999 code and I've never had any issues by using the latest code available.
Originally posted by peter d:
No, if I have a 480 volt panel and a 208 panel in the same building with seperate conduit runs to feed branch circuits and 2 junction boxes side by side, you can open each one up and identify what the voltage will be by the wire colors.There are still no code rules that require identification of phase conductors of the same system.
First, in my company, the owner has a few guys that run projects. He bids the work and lets his foremen decide the best way to do the job.Originally posted by iwire:
More power to youOriginally posted by kpepin:
I always try to slowly incorporate any code changes as soon as the new code is released. I can't recall any instance where the new code is less strict than the previous. In fact, I think a lot of town in my area are still using the 1999 code and I've never had any issues by using the latest code available.but I do not see how you can be competitive that way.
You bid a job based on 2005 while the competition bids the same job based on 1999?
Well that's nifty logic. I'm kind of stretching this but:I think that opening a juncion box and assuming that a wire color means something is very dangerous.