TRANSFORMER SECONDARY CONDUCTORS

Status
Not open for further replies.
infinity said:
He could be using the 12.5% rule for the SSBJ in each raceway but it's not required. If you had only one raceway, say a wireway, then you would have only one SSBJ which would need to be sized according to the 12.5%.
Click to expand...

OK that's whats confusing if its a SSBJ in raceway and 250 .66 says 250 alu in the 2014 code book table 250 .(c)(1) says see notes which is 12.5% and I know its not used in this case but table 250.122 shows if I had a 2000 amp breaker a 400 mcm in raceway with phase & neutral which is close to 12.5% used in 250(c)(1) . I just don't see the logic here when you say he could have but a 3/0 is ok .
So is it the combined total mcm of all raceways or he could have installed a 3/0 in one or each of the raceways ?
 
Last edited:
ohmhead said:
OK that's whats confusing if its a SSBJ in raceway and 250 .66 says 250 alu in the 2014 code book table 250 .(c)(1) says see notes which is 12.5% and I know its not used in this case but table 250.122 shows if I had a 2000 amp breaker a 400 mcm in raceway with phase & neutral which is close to 12.5% used in 250(c)(1) . I just don't see the logic here when you say he could have but a 3/0 is ok .
Click to expand...

Just remember the #3/0 is not a singular SSBJ, there are actually six of them connected at both ends in parallel.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top