scotteng
Member
- Location
- Apollo Beach, FL
- Occupation
- Professional Engineer
Can Type NM cable be installed in EMT in dry locations in a single family dwelling? This is not a question of whether or not it's a good practice, but one of code allowance.
You want to go first--I'll delete my response...lolDang it
Yes it's allowed. For flat cables you would need to size the EMT as if the cable were round using its largest dimension. Since it's considered a single conductor you can use 53% fill of the raceway.Can Type NM cable be installed in EMT in dry locations in a single family dwelling? This is not a question of whether or not it's a good practice, but one of code allowance.
A multiconductor cable, optical fiber cable, or flexible
cord of two or more conductors shall be treated as a
single conductor for calculating percentage conduit or
tubing fill area. For cables that have elliptical cross
sections, the cross-sectional area calculation shall be
based on using the major diameter of the ellipse as a
circle diameter. Assemblies of single insulated conductors
without an overall covering shall not be considered
a cable when determining conduit or tubing fill area.
The conduit or tubing fill for the assemblies shall be
calculated based upon the individual conductors.
So what size does that equal for 12-2? Will it fit in half? (Too lazy to do the math and looking up)Yes it's allowed. For flat cables you would need to size the EMT as if the cable were round using its largest dimension. Since it's considered a single conductor you can use 53% fill of the raceway.
53% of 1/2" EMT is 0.161 square inches. I don't have the width of 12/2 at the moment.So what size does that equal for 12-2? Will it fit in half? (Too lazy to do the math and looking up)
Ok I don't have calipers, but using my tape measure looks like about 6 and a third 16's or .395. so an area of .122. looks like it fits!53% of 1/2" EMT is 0.161 square inches. I don't have the width of 12/2 at the moment.
The stuff I measured was definitely smaller than that. Perhaps a different brand or manufacturing differences , but irregardless it still fits in 1/2 EMTSouthwire says their 12/2 NM has a width of 0.430". Click on the "specifications" tab on this page:
![]()
12-2 CU NM-B WITH GROUND 250 FT | Southwire
www.southwire.com
That's an area of 0.145 in2.
Cheers, Wayne
Tom,This is often done in basement for a receptacle onexposed wall, use EMT on the wall up to ceiling
You’ll need a bushing on the end of EMT, there is a push on plastic one, I use a box connectorTom,
Thanks for this real world application. I have seen this a number of times in older basements. Yet wondered if this was kosher or not. Not many basement in these new developments popping up all over Kitsap.
Drew
I Will usually have one of these couplers on the EMT where the NM is going into the EMT not a bushing.You’ll need a bushing on the end of EMT, there is a push on plastic one, I use a box connector

That's the connector that most EI's in my area will accept. Is there a Code section that doesn't allow you to strip the sheathing off the NM cable ? What happens if you have one cable in and one cable out to another receptacle ?I Will usually have one of these couplers on the EMT where the NM is going into the EMT not a bushing.
View attachment 2558681
Another note is that the NM sheathing is not to be stripped as it runs through the conduit. (Just thought I'd point it out as other posts had asked can this be done.)
I would say two issues with stripping. First is the article 310 marking requirements, but more importantly the NM inners are not an approved article 310 conductor.That's the connector that most EI's in my area will accept. Is there a Code section that doesn't allow you to strip the sheathing off the NM cable ? What happens if you have one cable in and one cable out to another receptacle ?
I believe they are approved but aren't labeled or marked. There is a difference IMOI would say two issues with stripping. First is the article 310 marking requirements, but more importantly the NM inners are not an approved article 310 conductor.
