For the ideal case wouldn't this cause a runaway feedback loop? The voltage drops, so the current rises, so the voltage drops some more, so the current rises some more...A lighting load which uses an active driver circuit (LED, fluorescent, etc.) can be designed to draw a constant power to the lamp regardless of small fulctuations in input voltage. So a 5% drop in voltage at the fixture could cause a 5% increase in the current.
Suppose you have a fixed voltage source V, and let's consider the real, linear case, so you have a transmission/source resistance A and a (variable) load resistance B. The load wants to adjust B to get some target power P.For the ideal case wouldn't this cause a runaway feedback loop?
I am very surprised that a 20 amp breaker is tripping at 21 or 22 amps. The product standard permits them to carry that load forever without tripping. In many cases I have seen 20 amp breakers that have carried 25 amps forever without tripping.
Yes, there are variations in the calibration that could account for tripping so close to the nameplate, but since the product standard requires that the breaker carry its handle rating forever in a 40°C ambient, I am surprised....not likely that the breaker is actually in a 40°C ambient and as the ambient goes down, the trip point goes up.
For normal resistive loads, I'd say no. But I don't know enough about commercial LED luminaire driver circuits to say whether or not they would demand more current if the voltage drops.In your opinion could VD contribute to increased circuit current?
I am just saying that they will carry their rating forever in a 40°C ambient.In the next sentence after performance is investigated and marked for 40°C ambient, UL 489 and DIVQ prohibit continuous loads exceeding 80% of Amp rating.
"Unless otherwise marked, circuit breakers should not be loaded to exceed 80% of their current rating, where in normal operation the load will continue for three hours or more."
Since the rest of us would violate equipment listings loading breakers > 80% > 3hrs, the Don must be operating >1000 volts per 230.208(B), or using circuit breakers marked 100% rated per Exception in 210.20(A).
I am just saying that they will carry their rating forever in a 40°C ambient.
In the real world, some breakers routinely carry above their nameplate rating forever because they are not actually running in a 40°C ambient, and because the calibration for breakers is not exact.
In the real world, I would not expect a 20 amp breaker to actually trip at 21 or 22 amps even if left at that load for days, or weeks. Sure it might, but it appears to me that breakers typically operate closer to the maximum trip than to the minimum trip on the time current curves.
It may not be exact but it could also be slightly lower.
it could take hours for a breaker to trip at 21 or 22 amps.
possibly days if it is colder.
My first point on a test curve is 110% for a relay.In the real world, I would not expect a 20 amp breaker to actually trip at 21 or 22 amps even if left at that load for days, or weeks. Sure it might, but it appears to me that breakers typically operate closer to the maximum trip than to the minimum trip on the time current curves.
Yes and that is likely the reason that breakers in the real world will carry a few amps over nameplate forever as they are not operating in a 40°C ambient.My first point on a test curve is 110% for a relay.
I may set up and test a magnetic breaker at 110% and time it out FTHOI..
If I do I’ll get back with the results.
I’ll have a hard time hitting the 40C mark..
too hot for me.
I bet it follows close to this. QPs are what I have at the shop..
Use your wife's oven. I assure you, your house will easily hit 40°C.I’ll have a hard time hitting the 40C mark..
too hot for me.
I won’t be able to attain 104 on a test bench situation.Yes and that is likely the reason that breakers in the real world will carry a few amps over nameplate forever as they are not operating in a 40°C ambient.
I have worked on a number of commercial buildings where loads have been added after the original installations. Often as part of a service call for "hot" conduits. In a number of these cases, there were lighting loads that were drawing a few amps over the breaker rating and the breakers were not tripping....no testing....just observation of real world installations.I won’t be able to attain 104 on a test bench situation.
In an actual breaker panel 100+ degrees isn’t hard to attain, especially in the summer.
I infrared many panels and even in the winter I find several over 100.
It’s the main reason I refuse to use the 30C ratings on CTs.
Always 50C.
I have worked on a number of commercial buildings where loads have been added after the original installations. Often as part of a service call for "hot" conduits. In a number of these cases, there were lighting loads that were drawing a few amps over the breaker rating and the breakers were not tripping....no testing....just observation of real world installations.
The code and the breaker standard limit the continuous loads, not for any safety reason, but just as an attempt to limit breaker tripping...something no one really wants to have happen.
I see a lot of answers that suggest the operation of the 20 amp CB is a definite operating point. I would like to say thatHello all, this's my scenario,
Temporary panel 240V, single phase feeding lighting in construction commercial building, the lighting load is supply through 20A, single pole circuit breaker, the breaker tripping time to time.
I've checked and I got measurement 21-22amp in the circuit, seem to me evident overload. I've already fixed adding another home run and divide the total load in two circuits. When I told my supervisor about this situation, he says the breaker was tripped due to voltage drop because when the voltage decrease, the current increase and trip the breaker.
I think he's wrong and also I don't believe what he says is the best example to show the relationship between voltage and current.
Because we learn everyday in this forum I'd like hear the opinion of the experts.
Thanks in advance