redz2500
Member
- Location
- Concord,ca 94520
I believe the "electrode" stops when it comes out of the ground. I also believe there is no logical reason why the copper pipe is not allowed to be used to reach from point A to point B if it is electrically continuous as the code states. Testing wouldn't even be required if I bonded within 5' I could then got to the furthest hose bib and run a jumper to my supplemental rod. How does it make sense that the pipe is a conductor one way but not the other? If a piece of copper was replaced in the middle would we not be impacted either way? There is no logic to any of this IMO.If the GEC can connect anywhere on the water pipe why do we need an exception for qualified persons?
Do you agree that the electrode stops where it is no longer buried in the earth?
I have recently seen a home built on posts where the main water line comes out of the ground 40' from the home. It routes under the detached driveway/garage strapped to framing before it goes from the garage to the dwelling above ground (10'). let me catch that within 5' of entering the dwelling even though its 50+- feet from where it actually becomes an electrode?
The only logical explanation to this not being allowed is that someone may replace a piece of copper with PVC or PEX. Well I was told that it is required to bond around that connection in the plumbing code. I would be significantly more concerned with loosing the ground on outlets with the older homes in this case than the 5 amps at 25 ohms of resistance if present we gain by connecting the main service piping. This logic is why I believe it was removed from the 2011 cycle.
Sorry my brain only operates on logic. A+B=C / B+A also = C. I feel the code is written the same way and should be interpreted as such.