ghostbuster said:
...We have been measuring voltage transients(which I believe you are calling line surges) for over 30 years. ...
That's great. I'm very interested in someone with experience to understand the reference to "line surge" in 250.4A1. But no, I'm not equating "voltage transient" with "line surge". That particular equivalency was suggested by another poster in response to me asking for a definition of "line surge".
ghostbuster said:
...What flavour do you want to discuss to-day??
Flavor of "voltage transient"? Absolutely none - unless it relates to the "line surge" referred to in 250.4A1.
I have really tried to be clear on this - I not sure how I can explain my specific lack of knowledge any better than I already have, but I'll try again.
NEC 250.4A1 discusses limiting the voltage imposed by "... lightning,
line surge, or incidental contact with higher-voltage lines ...". NEC 250.4A1 also alludes to a grounded system helping to mitigate this voltage.
From this NEC article, I infer the NEC considers voltage anomalies from "lightning", separate from "line surge", separate from "incidental contact with higher-voltage lines"
I think I understand voltage anomalies caused by lightning. I think I understand voltage anomalies caused by incidental contact with HV lines.
********* Please listen to this piece *************
I don't know what NEC 250.4A1 is referring to when it uses the term "line surge"
So, the questions are:
What is line surge (as used in NEC 250.4A1)?
What are some causes of line surge?
How would a grounded system mitigate the effects of a line surge?
Alternate question only if the first three are not answered:
How would one measure this undefined line surge?
**** Hope you got clear to here ***************
This is not just a debate thing for me. I really am interested in what the NEC is trying to save us from.
carl