melanconelectric
Member
- Location
- West Monroe, LA
Don't eliminate anything until you've verified and checked and double checked that it needs to be eliminated and then check with the HO again to see if they've changed their minds.
Now that you are rethinking the situation the right thing to do would be to subtract the time spent relabeling the panel, which did not have any thing to do with the circuit problems, send the balance back with note saying that after reconsideration you failed to verify the circuits and that was covered under warranty. DO NOT send him a credit memo. You will wind up being this guys indentured servant.
But how are you now going to handle the code violation of the outdoor recpt. on the bath gfci circuit?
I will send him the balance with everything but just the time spent relabeling. About the outdoor outlet, it was like that since the house was built so would I have to change it to it's own circuit or just leave it on the bathroom where it was? I don't believe I need to change it b/c all I did was remove an outlet and replace it with a GFCI. The outdoor outlet is now protected by the bath GFCI.
IMO this is a perfect reason why there needs to be Licensing in place.
What happened to "the customer is always right". If they want me to waste time doing it their way, why do I have to refund them to do it my way.
I think educating the customer is part of the gig. I am not saying he should keep every penny, and any gesture at this point will get him a bit of praise from the HO, so keep it small, not to be greedy, but to remind the HO that their "help" is dubious at best.
Too many martyrs around here
I am not against licensing but IMO the fact someone has a license does not mean they are actually qualified to do anything.
I am not against licensing but IMO the fact someone has a license does not mean they are actually qualified to do anything.
Marc is not licensed but IMO he is qualified to do almost any electrical trade task.
I am not against licensing but IMO the fact someone has a license does not mean they are actually qualified to do anything.
Marc is not licensed but IMO he is qualified to do almost any electrical trade task.
I am not against licensing but IMO the fact someone has a license does not mean they are actually qualified to do anything.
How many times do we need to cover this material.
.
I Feel like Marc is a very smart guy too but thats not the point.
OK Real life scenario. You have to prove that you have a 12000 hours on the job experience from legitimate LIC EC's. 6000 of those hours had to be foreman or supervised. You also have to have certified letters from these contractors stating that you are competent in performing electrical work.
After all that you have to take a very hard exam which is based on the NEC,(our Bible).
Now I don't care what you say, but IMO, someone who has gone through that will be more qualified than someone in the trade that has been doing it for 6 months or 2 years thats decides when he wakes up in the morning," Hey I'm going to become an EC this week.
I'm sure Marc is a very good Electrician, But thats not good enough in allot of states.
Well presented, however, some states the licensing is no more then a permit, and payment
In the states that have proven hours and both trade knowladge and code testing, the person passing the testing and proving their experience, has shown he has mastered at least the basic skills needed, but it does not always make them a good electrician.
Over the years, I have found the ones that complain about licensing, are usually those that don't feel they can pass the testing or meet the min hours needed. They can be good electricians out there that are good or even great in certian areas only, but they will not meet some state or local requirements, then it is time for them to bone up on the weak areas and apply for the license.
Here's an old story that exemplifies this post:
The next day, FedEx shows up with a package. Inside is the corrected invoice. It read "Turn a Franzenhimmel Nut one-half turn clockwise... $5. Knowing which Franzenhimmel Nut to turn.... $495."
I agreeWell presented, however, some states the licensing is no more then a permit, and payment
I agree with that as well.In the states that have proven hours and both trade knowladge and code testing, the person passing the testing and proving their experience, has shown he has mastered at least the basic skills needed, but it does not always make them a good electrician.
I really agree with that.Over the years, I have found the ones that complain about licensing, are usually those that don't feel they can pass the testing or meet the min hours needed.
And with that I should have just said I agree with your whole post :smile:They can be good electricians out there that are good or even great in certian areas only, but they will not meet some state or local requirements, then it is time for them to bone up on the weak areas and apply for the license.
If your not agianst it Bob then why have it at all?