Why is it so hard to understand

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chamuit

Grumpy Old Man
Location
Texas
Occupation
Electrician
F.W.E.

F.W.E.

I am a self-identified forty-winks engineer. Although, I don't advertise that on my business cards. :angel:
 

K8MHZ

Senior Member
Location
Michigan. It's a beautiful peninsula, I've looked
Occupation
Electrician
For clearing faults, multiple parallel paths and loops are no issue.

Multiple parallel paths and loops may, however, cause problems with audio and radio installations. In radio, we try to use a 'single point ground' system. That's not self explanatory. But in a nutshell, we try to do away with as many parallel grounding paths and loops as we can. I heard the same is done on audio systems, but that's not my thing.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
A registered engineer working on electrical systems is probably versed at bonding and grounding issues.
Agreed and this is the reason I do not think the guy is what he claims to be.

Roger
 

cuba_pete

Senior Member
Location
Washington State
For clearing faults, multiple parallel paths and loops are no issue.

Multiple parallel paths and loops may, however, cause problems with audio and radio installations. In radio, we try to use a 'single point ground' system. That's not self explanatory. But in a nutshell, we try to do away with as many parallel grounding paths and loops as we can. I heard the same is done on audio systems, but that's not my thing.

Depending on the frequencies of interest, yes, both radio and audio can benefit from a properly bonded/grounded single-point ground system.

I have an extensive system that I have to explain to PE's, EE's, and sparkies pretty regularly. Some see the IG receptacles and immediately call witchcraft...having no idea how to implement any of the basic methods in the Green or Emerald books at all.

All of my "engineering" experience came from working on the same equipment for about 28 years now. I am an electronics technician by paygrade, but engineer by job title.
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Depending on the frequencies of interest, yes, both radio and audio can benefit from a properly bonded/grounded single-point ground system.

I have an extensive system that I have to explain to PE's, EE's, and sparkies pretty regularly. Some see the IG receptacles and immediately call witchcraft...having no idea how to implement any of the basic methods in the Green or Emerald books at all.

All of my "engineering" experience came from working on the same equipment for about 28 years now. I am an electronics technician by paygrade, but engineer by job title.

IG is voodoo 99% of the time and is generally compromised soon after installation.
 

JFletcher

Senior Member
Location
Williamsburg, VA
We're not talking about supplementary (ie, not code required) ground rods are we? I was watching a MH video where he was showing that driving an extra rod, say at a generator, or for a PV array, could fry the electronics in event of a lightning strike. Lightning hits earth, travels up the ground rod at the generator/array, thru the circuitry, then back to the ground at the service.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
We're not talking about supplementary (ie, not code required) ground rods are we? I was watching a MH video where he was showing that driving an extra rod, say at a generator, or for a PV array, could fry the electronics in event of a lightning strike. Lightning hits earth, travels up the ground rod at the generator/array, thru the circuitry, then back to the ground at the service.
Earthing is not in the question, it's about EGC's.

Roger
 

Carultch

Senior Member
Location
Massachusetts
We're not talking about supplementary (ie, not code required) ground rods are we? I was watching a MH video where he was showing that driving an extra rod, say at a generator, or for a PV array, could fry the electronics in event of a lightning strike. Lightning hits earth, travels up the ground rod at the generator/array, thru the circuitry, then back to the ground at the service.

So what exactly are we supposed to do with 690.47(D)anger? Put in the counterproductive superfluous electrode anyway, and then disconnect it after you get your approval?
 

romex jockey

Senior Member
Location
Vermont
Occupation
electrician
Earthing is not in the question, it's about EGC's.

Roger

They are connected as a system Roger

How our NEC system is configured via art 250 is where most sparks end, because this is what we are trained to do

Unfortunately said manual forwards little on theory , in fact even soars expands very little on the theory of how GEC & ECG coexist.

This is why i encourage the study of other earthing systems. I've also found the better engineers dwell on comparative analysis (as opposed to those all engine, no ears) from this objective stance , vs. the subjective constraints of nec offerings.

~RJ~
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
They are connected as a system Roger
Everybody understands that Steve however, you can have either without the other and they would perform their intended functions the same.

With that said, let's do away with earthing in this thread and concentrate on a low impedance path to the source.

This low impedance path's intended function is to clear faults and a path consisting of multiple loops of conductors, conduits, pipes, metal framing, etc ... (the more the merrier) is a good thing.

Roger
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
For clearing faults, multiple parallel paths and loops are no issue.

Multiple parallel paths and loops may, however, cause problems with audio and radio installations. In radio, we try to use a 'single point ground' system. That's not self explanatory. But in a nutshell, we try to do away with as many parallel grounding paths and loops as we can. I heard the same is done on audio systems, but that's not my thing.
I though that term referred to a single point of connection between the GEC, EGCs and the grounded conductor(s) and not to parallel paths in the equipment grounding system. Such paths are almost impossible to avoid unless you take special care in the design and installation of the system, especially where you are using wiring methods that are metallic and connecting to equipment with metallic cases.
 

K8MHZ

Senior Member
Location
Michigan. It's a beautiful peninsula, I've looked
Occupation
Electrician
I though that term referred to a single point of connection between the GEC, EGCs and the grounded conductor(s) and not to parallel paths in the equipment grounding system. Such paths are almost impossible to avoid unless you take special care in the design and installation of the system, especially where you are using wiring methods that are metallic and connecting to equipment with metallic cases.

Good point. SPG does mean different things to AC mains power and audio/radio set ups. SPG in audio/radio means attempting to bring all equipment chassis grounds to a single point, preferably with the same length conductors, and doing so without violating NEC grounding requirements. It is an attempt to best eliminate all loops in the chassis grounding connections, which is easier said than done. Audio/radio SPG is not done for safety, like NEC SPG, instead it's done to attempt to eliminate current flow at audio/radio frequencies on the grounding conductors which may cause noise or RF burns.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_loop_(electricity)
[FONT=&quot]If A and B are simple electricalapparatus, the signals between them being of a simple nature, such as 24V DC tocontrol relays, this ground loop is harmless and merely reinforces thegrounding system, such that, if for example, B develops a fault causing itsmetalwork to become live, in addition to its own protective ground conductorthere is an additional path to ground via A, so the momentary rise in potentialbefore the fuse or circuit breaker operates to remove power will be reducedsomewhat, improving safety.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]However,if A and B are electronic apparatus such as parts of an audio system, or acomputer system, the signal(s), typically in the region of millivolts to a fewvolts, passing between them will be vulnerable to corruption.”[/FONT]


[FONT=&quot]It’s very common in electronic system,including audio system, to have the circuit board ground (low voltage circuit systemground, not the AC green wire EGC) connected to the device chassis. In thiscase, when there is a ground loop current (by multi- EGC paths in the ACdistribution) then this ground loop current create different voltage potentialon different audio equipment, or different system ground voltage on theinterconnected equipment, which leads to noise or hum (a 1V audio signal from pre-ampA becomes 1.2V (distorted) in recorder B).[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]So it is depending on the purpose:for a normal AC power distribution, a multiple ground paths for fault clearing isdesirable, but this could lead to negative effects if the site has sensitiveelectronic equipment, e.g. computers or audios. For a communication company, doyou want to buy a building with multi-path EGC for fault clearing?[/FONT]
 

romex jockey

Senior Member
Location
Vermont
Occupation
electrician
A 'ground loop' can be rather hard to mitigate, considering the construction methods of M.E.N. and S.D.S. 's prevalent to most American industry. Best examples are Cat 5e trunk lines, remote VFD & PLC's entering such structures all doomed from the start to sensitivity problems inherent in said design.

From your link>
From a noise perspective it is preferable to have "single-point grounding", with the system connected to the building ground wire at only one point. National electrical codes, however, often require all AC powered components to have third-wire grounds; from a safety standpoint it is preferable to have each AC component grounded. However the multiple ground connections cause ground loops when the components are interconnected by signal cables, as shown below.

Our NEC approach , which arguably dictates it's own art 250 violations>

250.6>
(B) Alterations to Stop Objectionable Current. If the
use of multiple grounding connections results in objection-
able current, one or more of the following alterations shall
be permitted to be made, provided that the requirements of
2S0.4(A)(S) or (B)( 4) are met:
(1) Discontinue one or more but not all of such grounding
connections.
(2) Change the locations of the grounding connections.
(3) Interrupt the continuity of the conductor or conductive
path causing the objectionable current.
(4) Take other suitable remedial and approved action.

~RJ~
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
A 'ground loop' can be rather hard to mitigate, considering the construction methods of M.E.N. and S.D.S. 's prevalent to most American industry. Best examples are Cat 5e trunk lines, remote VFD & PLC's entering such structures all doomed from the start to sensitivity problems inherent in said design.
~RJ~
I don't understand. I work in a plant that has all of those things operating without issues and there are hundreds if not thousands of parallel paths for the EGC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top