- Location
- Illinois
- Occupation
- retired electrician
What's the % loss/mile on the grid?
I can't answer that directly, but I understand that overall transmission losses are about 50%. Sorry, can't remember where I picked that up.
This document estimates the US transmission and distribution losses at 7.2%.
I have intentionally stayed out of this discussion. I am not an engineer, have never worked in relaying, substation design, or transmission line design. My expertise is in distribution and codes and standards. I am familiar with some of the things you guys have talked about but don't have the basic knowledge to enter the conversation. This is an interesting conversation though, especially about the Texas interconnection. It is interesting to me that Texas has a treaty with the US that permits it to secede from the union and it may also divide itself into either 3 or 5 states with all of the rights of a state. :smile:. . . I know Charlie E another Mod can if he picks up on this. . .
don -It really doesn't matter. There are 3 interconnect grids in the US and any load or generation change within a grid has an effect on the grid frequency. As you get a larger distance away from the point of the frequency disturbance, the magnitude of the disturbance is dampened.
As I recall (400 level class in transmission - 23 years ago - recollection could be a bit fuzzy) short DC links are put in for stability reasons. The two examples we worked were James Bay Hydro AC transmission to a back to back, DC link at Niagra Falls; and a 30 mile (kilometer?) under water, DC link to Goat Island, Norway. These two DC links were put in to prevent stability problems associated with AC links.---A converter to get from AC to DC then an inverter, possibly mains commutated, to get it back to AC.
Not quite sure I see the point for the sort powers at grid interconnector level though, unless you are going to take advantage HVDC transmission. ---
The amount of frequency deviation is small. I think that the protective relaying starts tripping generators and circuits off line with a deviation of 0.2 hertz or so. When there is a large load change or generation change, the frequency of the grid in that area changes. As that change ripples across the grid it is dampened. It is my understanding that even though everything in a grid is physically connected together the frequency is not exactly the same across the whole interconnect. Not really sure how this works.don -
Would "phase" or "phase differential" be a better description than "frequency"?
I'm thinking that if the the phase angle is off far enough to be a frequency disturbance, then one of the generators is exceeding a 90deg power angle and is slipping a pole.
Maybe it is just a semantics issue. But the idea of a frequency "disturbance" for two gens tied together - brings to mind the poles of one gen going by the poles of other --- ouch!
cf
Not entirely true.Texas has a treaty with the US that permits it to secede from the union and it may also divide itself into either 3 or 5 states with all of the rights of a state. :smile:
as a "little brother" myself, I would like to say that is a term I think all of us "younger brother's" resent.
I prefer "the more handsome brother".
or "the taller brother".
or "the one who didn't have to endure the first-born overprotectiveness of mommy and daddy, and by the time I reached 16, curfews were a thing of the past".
Interesting link. I didn't know that asynchronous gereration existed for major power generation in USA, or anywhere for that matter.Here is a link to some HVDC systems that were made by Siemens. They range in capacity from 55 MW to 3100MW. Some are used to match the frequency between two girds, and other are used for long distance high power transmission circuits.