Would capping off live wires be considered securing a circuit.

Status
Not open for further replies.
petersonra said:
If he was written up for "not securing the circuit" he may well have a case that he did secure the circuit.

If he was written up for "not turning off the power" he is out of luck, IMO.

I am not sure just what the write-up says.
Click to expand...
Depending on the company policy on hot work, his action to "secure" the circuit could itself be a violation.
 
roger said:
That was the same as what we had. Hot work permits had to be signed by the buildings/facilities rep, our office manager, project manager, and the job superintendent.

Roger
Click to expand...

In a lot of areas HOT WORK means welding work, while LIVE WORK means energized electrical work.
Big difference when the safety team isn't consistent in their terminology, not to mention doesn't understand electrical slang.
 
jim dungar said:
In a lot of areas HOT WORK means welding work, while LIVE WORK means energized electrical work.
Big difference when the safety team isn't consistent in their terminology, not to mention doesn't understand electrical slang.
Click to expand...
I agree, but in our safety program live work was "Hot Work".

Roger
 
roger said:
I agree, but in our safety program live work was "Hot Work".

Roger
Click to expand...
I know many electrical safety people consider energized equipment as Hot Work. The problem is OSHA (based on my last OSHA10 training and many others may not.
When talking to lawyers, safety experts, and OSHA inspectors using easily mis-understood terminology can result in unexpected outcomes.
 
I am pretty sure NFPA70E refers to it as an energized electrical work permit.

As far as I know the only exception to the requirement to have such a permit is for troubleshooting, testing, or voltage measurement, and I don't see that capping off the wires is troubleshooting, testing, or voltage measurement.
 
Where I work we don't follow NFPA70E I'm guessing that's because it was never formally adopted. Even if it were they would surely look to blur the lines between what's allowed and what isn't.
 
infinity said:
Where I work we don't follow NFPA70E I'm guessing that's because it was never formally adopted. Even if it were they would surely look to blur the lines between what's allowed and what isn't.
Click to expand...
Is some other comprehensive safety standard explicitly referenced or else a locally written comprehensive policy? If not, you employer is probably not OSHA compliant.
OSHA does not require that you choose an adopted standard, just that you can point to some credible standard when the lawsuit or citation hits.
 
jim dungar said:
I know many electrical safety people consider energized equipment as Hot Work. The problem is OSHA (based on my last OSHA10 training and many others may not.
When talking to lawyers, safety experts, and OSHA inspectors using easily mis-understood terminology can result in unexpected outcomes.
Click to expand...
And I agree again but if a term is defined in a manual, it does hold weight. There are times when speaking legalese to use words such as grounded conductor and ungrounded conductor then there are times to use hot and neutral, it all depends on how proper you need to be.

It's kind of like specs where in the general conditions it says the electrical contractor from this point forward will be refered to as this contractor.

Roger.
 
roger said:
And I agree again but if a term is defined in a manual, it does hold weight. There are times when speaking legalese to use words such as grounded conductor and ungrounded conductor then there are times to use hot and neutral, it all depends on how proper you need to be.
Click to expand...

My point is to make sure you are using the terminology the other people in the conversation understand and are also using.
Simply saying a person was shocked at work because hot work permits were not required, can be very misleading depending on the audience.
 
I often wonder why professional, highly skilled and trained electricians cannot work on live circuits. Linemen are out there every day doing just that so why is it taboo for the rest of us? Certainly an electrician is capable of learning how to work safely on energized equipment.
 
infinity said:
I often wonder why professional, highly skilled and trained electricians cannot work on live circuits. Linemen are out there every day doing just that so why is it taboo for the rest of us? Certainly an electrician is capable of learning how to work safely on energized equipment.
Click to expand...
NFPA70E is about safe electrical work practices, it does not even contain the word electrician.
i know of many industrial electricians that are not licensed, even if they have been trained. I do not know of any DIY lineman.
 
infinity said:
I often wonder why professional, highly skilled and trained electricians cannot work on live circuits. Linemen are out there every day doing just that so why is it taboo for the rest of us? Certainly an electrician is capable of learning how to work safely on energized equipment.
Click to expand...
Insurance companies are a big reason in my opinion.
 
ActionDave said:
Insurance companies are a big reason in my opinion.
Click to expand...

I think your opinion is correct, I would also add lawyers to that. Let face it we live in a sue happy world, people are always look for easy money and that nothing is their fault. Always got to blame someone else for their mistake.


“ shoot low boys their riding shetland ponies”
 
petersonra said:
If he was written up for "not securing the circuit" he may well have a case that he did secure the circuit.

If he was written up for "not turning off the power" he is out of luck, IMO.

I am not sure just what the write-up says.
Click to expand...
I was written up for not securing the circuit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top