1981
1981
Mike,
You are inspiring. I also reached up and grabbed the 1981 cycle and to my surprise....[422-5] stated Exception 3 that branch circuits supplying household cooking appliances shall be permitted to be in accordance with Table 220-19 (220.55). At least there is a consistancy in the past.
The "in accordance" verbiage seems to qualify each particular statement as "shall be permitted" for DF calculations and "shall be sized" in appliance BC conductor installation as signified in [422.10]. So I guess I am asking everyone what their interpretation of why there is a somewhat conflicting two statement directions of the 2008 422.10? rbj
1981
I just reached up and grabbed a book and it states in 422-5 Exception 3 that branch ciruits supplying cooking appliances are premitted to be sized in accordance with Table 220-19 which is the same as Table 220.55 today. This is out of the 1984 cycle so I wouldn't think that it is something new
Mike,
You are inspiring. I also reached up and grabbed the 1981 cycle and to my surprise....[422-5] stated Exception 3 that branch circuits supplying household cooking appliances shall be permitted to be in accordance with Table 220-19 (220.55). At least there is a consistancy in the past.
The "in accordance" verbiage seems to qualify each particular statement as "shall be permitted" for DF calculations and "shall be sized" in appliance BC conductor installation as signified in [422.10]. So I guess I am asking everyone what their interpretation of why there is a somewhat conflicting two statement directions of the 2008 422.10? rbj