Raintight fittings and emt

Status
Not open for further replies.
Location
Florida
Occupation
Solar EPC
Needing to replace the following run with rain tight fittings and just want to make sure my logic is sound:

IMG_5833.jpeg

Plan is to replace the LB with a RGD version with threads, replace all screw connectors (yellow) with rain tight compression connectors, and replace the 90 with a bend.

I assume I need to replace the connector stubbing into the wall as well, hence the arrow.

Any easier way?
 
If you can move that disco a smidge to the right you could just bend a 90 in the conduit?
I use EMT (NPS straight thread) with/RT fittings into threaded hubs (NTP tapered thread) like a conduit LB often, and my local AHJ's allow it.
However...
Technically EMT RT fittings are only UL listed for use with a locknut (not a hub) and I have ran into an AHJ whom enforces that, my work around was to first thread the locknut onto the fitting and then O-ring then the LB or bell box (NTP threaded). I think now at least one manufacturer makes tapered thread (NTP) EMT fittings.
1703121924869.png
 
If you can move that disco a smidge to the right you could just bend a 90 in the conduit?
I use EMT (NPS straight thread) with/RT fittings into threaded hubs (NTP tapered thread) like a conduit LB often, and my local AHJ's allow it.
However...
Technically EMT RT fittings are only UL listed for use with a locknut (not a hub) and I have ran into an AHJ whom enforces that, my work around was to first thread the locknut onto the fitting and then O-ring then the LB or bell box (NTP threaded). I think now at least one manufacturer makes tapered thread (NTP) EMT fittings.
View attachment 2569180
That was my original plan and assuming I may have to move the disco over there are a few inches. To my knowledge there is nothing restricting a minimum separation between boxes other than what I need for the fittings.

Thank you for the info about thread shape as well.

I was going to do what you described but leave the locknut off, not sure what purpose it would serve at that point. Would also tape the threads.
 
Are the enclosure entries below energizes parts?
Not sure I understand your meaning?

The general rule (312.2) is that only conduit entries above live parts need to use fittings listed for wet locations (side question: does 312 apply to a pull out type disconnect? :unsure: ). However I think even if below live parts, although it woudnt be required by 312, I believe the EMT article would require the raintight fitting....
 
80 isn't hard to work with. If given the choice for 2 ft of conduit I'd pick it over emt any day. I'd even want to use a metal rigid nipple vs emt for the panel to disconnect.
Thanks for this feedback. A few questions:

Do you have to use sch80 pvc specific fittings (lbs, male adapters, etc) when using sch80 piping?

I’ve seen where guys like to use things like a Meyers hub threading in with pvc when going into the top of a box. Do you have to do the same thing going into the sides or can you just use a male adapter with a locknut to be outdoor rated/raintight?

For the RGD nipple, I assume you mean the short pieces that are threaded on both ends. How do you secure them to the box and make them raintight as well?
 
Thanks for this feedback. A few questions:

Do you have to use sch80 pvc specific fittings (lbs, male adapters, etc) when using sch80 piping?

I’ve seen where guys like to use things like a Meyers hub threading in with pvc when going into the top of a box. Do you have to do the same thing going into the sides or can you just use a male adapter with a locknut to be outdoor rated/raintight?

For the RGD nipple, I assume you mean the short pieces that are threaded on both ends. How do you secure them to the box and make them raintight as well?
Pvc for the factory bends is all you need to be careful of.

Threaded rigid doesn't need to be rain tight. Only threadless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top