120/208 Single Phase Power Calculations

Status
Not open for further replies.
wwhitney said:
Your obsession with this terminological detail crossed the line from being informative to being annoying a long time ago.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
I don't think it is a detail when it is simply inaccurate.
GoldDigger has already pointed this out.
 
Besoeker3 said:
I don't think it is a detail when it is simply inaccurate.
Click to expand...
Terminology is conventional and may choose to emphasize different aspects. As there are no utilization loads I am aware of that depend on the phase difference between the two L-N legs of a 120/208V system, such a system only supplies single phase loads. So in this case, the terminology is based on what the system actually does in practice, not what it could do in theory. It is not up to you or me to decree that the terminology has to be based on the underlying physics.

If it makes you happy, when you see "120/208V single phase" just insert the word loading as you read it to yourself, as in "120/208V single phase (loading)". Or perhaps "120/208V single phase (loading; 2 of 3 phases physics)." That information is understood by any knowledgeable reader.

Cheers, Wayne
 
wwhitney said:
Terminology is conventional and may choose to emphasize different aspects. As there are no utilization loads I am aware of that depend on the phase difference between the two L-N legs of a 120/208V system, such a system only supplies single phase loads. So in this case, the terminology is based on what the system actually does in practice, not what it could do in theory. It is not up to you or me to decree that the terminology has to be based on the underlying physics.

If it makes you happy, when you see "120/208V single phase" just insert the word loading as you read it to yourself, as in "120/208V single phase (loading)". Or perhaps "120/208V single phase (loading; 2 of 3 phases physics)." That information is understood by any knowledgeable reader.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
I know exactly what it is. Just 208V and 120V are not in phase.
 
Last edited:
Besoeker3 said:
I know exactly what it is.
Click to expand...
Good, so then you can understand that the name may not depend on the physics, but rather on what type of loads the system is used for. The name can't be accurate for both the loading and the physics, and in this case the convention is to go with the loading. Please recognize the convention.

Cheers, Wayne
 
wwhitney said:
Good, so then you can understand that the name may not depend on the physics, but rather on what type of loads the system is used for. The name can't be accurate for both the loading and the physics, and in this case the convention is to go with the loading. Please recognize the convention.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
Yes, a convention. But it is not single phase..
 
Besoeker3 said:
Yes, a convention. But it is not single phase..
Click to expand...
What is is? : - )

I think we've covered that you might call a system "single phase" because it only supports single phase loads. Or you might call it "single phase" because it has only one phase angle present. It's not clear to me that the sentence "the system is single phase" necessarily means the latter rather than the former. I would say it is ambiguous.

Cheers, Wayne
 
wwhitney said:
What is is? : - )

I think we've covered that you might call a system "single phase" because it only supports single phase loads. Or you might call it "single phase" because it has only one phase angle present. It's not clear to me that the sentence "the system is single phase" necessarily means the latter rather than the former. I would say it is ambiguous.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
Yes,, one phase angle. How else could you describe it?
 
wwhitney said:
As we've been discussing, by the type of loads the system supplies, and how many phase angles they require.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
Thus many phases would not be single phase.................:)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top