To have two phasors requires three wires.Because the incoming 208v is a single sine wave, even though there are two phase conductors. The incoming 208v is calculated by subtracting the phasors of two of the phase voltages, hence the two wires. The voltage is still a single sine wave.
Uber technically, to establish a phase requires at least two instances. Once established—and maintained—it is a phase at any given instant.It has a phase at any given instant...
To have two phasors requires three wires.
The phase still needs a reference if you want to quantify the value.What about 2 line currents? ia/0 and ib/120
No. Arctan will not distinguish all four quadrants.isn't phase angle the arctan(img/real) at any given point in time?
How are you going to get two line currents with less than three wires?What about 2 line currents? ia/0 and ib/120
a phasor can be v, i, S
to MEASURE 2 v phasors you need 3 points
I'm uncertain what you are asking here. Thus I answer with a question....isn't phase angle the arctan(img/real) at any given point in time?
Suppose you meant to say arctan2, which solves the quadrant problem and the divide by zero problem. You are still using a reference because the axis is not a given. You can't assume a starting point on the signal, you have to specify a starting point and that my friend is specifying a reference.No. Arctan will not distinguish all four quadrants.
Wasn't that the simple original point rather than the convoluted mess that others have made it?For the 208 volts: yes; one signal means only one phase.
How are you going to get two line currents with less than three wires?
The voltage (singular) has only one phase.
To measure more than one [nominal] phase voltage requires more than the two 'lines' referenced.
I already stated one signal can serve as a reference to the other.
"fewer than three wires" = "less than three wires"Shouldn't that be fewer than three wires?
"fewer than three wires" = "less than three wires"
...or are we talking proper English? You would be correct according to some. But AFAIK it is not an etched-in-stone rule. I think it is just a rule some writers made up just to see how many they could get on board.
Yes.Wasn't that the simple original point rather than the convoluted mess that others have made it?
Correct, at minimum a third conductor is needed. The neutral is just a grounded conductor and provides the third conductor needed.One inference is 90 degree phase difference is not always required to make two phases. 120 degree difference would also make two phases provided neutral wire is available.
It's just that the name "two phase system" is reserved for the system with a 90 degree difference.
An "unaided" rotating field requirement of some specified quality or characteristic can be added for an application if so desired. It has nothing to do with the fundamental existence of a phase difference between two signals.Technically speaking, two phases with 120 degree phase difference would also create a rotating magnetic field unaided.
Is it inferior to that created by two phases with 90 degree phase difference?
No. Just correct."fewer than three wires" = "less than three wires"
...or are we talking proper English? You would be correct according to some.
The OP is about just two conductors.I think it has only historical significance.
Technically speaking, two phases with 120 degree phase difference would also create a rotating magnetic field unaided.