tadavidson
Senior Member
- Location
- Georgia
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
Are you thinking about a feeder to a remote (not attached) structure? I also say that ground rods are not a substitute for an equipment grounding conductor.
Are you thinking about a feeder to a remote (not attached) structure? I also say that ground rods are not a substitute for an equipment grounding conductor.
Yessir! I believe that to be the truth. I was looking to cite a code section that states just as you have said it.Up until the 2008 (I think that was the year) you could run a 3-wire feed to a separate building/structure as long as there were no metallic items (think water pipe, other conduit, etc.) in the path between buildings. Now we have to run a 4th (EGC) to avoid objectionable current on normally non-current carrying metallic items. Even then, a ground rod (or any grounding electrode) had to be installed.
You earlier post states the panel was in/on a shed... that's a building or structure ??Yessir except 250.32 state serving "building or structure" 2020 cycle.
On it (outside) but not serving it. Serving pool equipment located adjacent to building.You earlier post states the panel was in/on a shed... that's a building or structure ??
A pool sounds like a structure to me.On it (outside) but not serving it. Serving pool equipment located adjacent to building.
If shed contains pool chemicals then 680.25(A) Feeders, also applies...Pool installer sets pum, switch leg, etc at panel area.
Mounted to a structure but serving pool equipment outside of building.
Even a stand-alone pedestal or pole would be considered to be a structure in this situation.I am looking for code section that states a sub panel requires a "4th" wire pulled for ground in lieu of driven rods. I find a section that says building or structure but not simply "any sub panel". I have also tried searching the archive of post. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
205.?(B)What about 250(B) exception No.1
I was hoping ..205.?(B)
You left out the .xx
What is the Article you're citing?
Personally I would not be looking for exceptions when it comes to new pools and the EG requirements.
Which says?What about 250(B) exception No.1