electrofelon
Senior Member
- Location
- Cherry Valley NY, Seattle, WA
35 years
all heavy commercial/industrial
oil/gas
defense infrastructure
bio/pharma
manufacturing
mining
IBEW member for my first 4 years
most of it field work and design build
As I have proven even the example used in this thread would have been easier using the conventional method
2 less conduit
2 less gounds
6 less conductors
16 less terminations
2 less pulls
absolutely no disadvantage vs isophase, in fact a better more cost effective method
I didnt mean any disrespect, many engineers havent done much hands on. I just was wondering if you have done an installation with 4,5, or 6 conductors in parallel and played the "make it look nice without cutting any off game..." and I was proposing that you may feel differently after trying it.