AA-8000 rated aluminum (article 310)

It depends on where the service point is. Around here, the service point would be on the transformer spades. I know however that in other areas is is pretty common to have the service point be on the line side of the meter.
Huh yeah I am not sure "Premises wiring" to me means anything I can access at any time and mess with, I as the utility customer might provide some conduit and wire that I own to connect to facilities of the serving utility and that is a 'service lateral' thats not covered under the NEC per 90.2(D)(5)(a) its covered by utility specs.
I can't tap the service lateral and get free power but I do own it, its before my service point.
 
All I am saying is you can argue your service lateral does not even fall under the NM NEC code, it’s on the utility side of the meter / service point. You’re just installing it for the utility. After the meter yes AA-8000 rated.
Somehow both the power company and CID are calling this a customer owned service lateral. As well as the 30’ riser to the transformer is under CID jurisdiction. I’ve hit a dead end. One thing is for certain, it a bunch of bullshit!
 
Just reviewing definitions here:

Service Point. The point of connection between the facilities of
the serving utility and the premises wiring.

Service Lateral. The underground conductors between the utility
electric supply system and the service point.

Service-Entrance Conductors, Underground System. The
service conductors between the terminals of the service equipment
and the point of connection to the service lateral or under-
ground service conductors.

Not Covered by the NEC:
90.2(5)(a) Installations under the exclusive control of an electric utility where such installations
a. Consist of service drops or service laterals, and associated metering,
 
"Customer owned service lateral" makes no sense! I think they need to review the definitions.
I own my service lateral to my house, if it fails I have to replace it, but its before my meter so 'under exclusive control' of the utility, the NEC does not apply to it.

Here is some info from the NM website discussing 'customer owned power lines':
And they say you have to be a licensed contractor but follow applicable codes they mention the NESC which is whats used here in Oregon for service laterals.
 
I own my service lateral to my house, if it fails I have to replace it, but its before my meter so 'under exclusive control' of the utility, the NEC does not apply to it.

Here is some info from the NM website discussing 'customer owned power lines':
And they say you have to be a licensed contractor but follow applicable codes they mention the NESC which is whats used here in Oregon for service laterals.
I’ll give a call to the power company engineer who I went through for the transformer upgrade. Also, I do lots of service changes and it never ceases to amaze me to see the power co. using the original lateral with wire rated for 100A.
 
Clarification is required as to the exact location of the service point.
How many overhead residential services have you installed in your career? How many f the meter? Who provided the riser and conductor material? Were the riser conductors selected per utility requirements or per the NEC.
 
I’ll give a call to the power company engineer who I went through for the transformer upgrade. Also, I do lots of service changes and it never ceases to amaze me to see the power co. using the original lateral with wire rated for 100A.
Please do and plrease file a written appeal with CID, Stating that a service lateral is exampt form the requirements of the NEC and falls under the NESC. the NEC section is 90.2(5)(a) it may save you that 5k.
 
Ok there is mention of AA-8000 in NEC 2014
with a exception that is very confusing. Article 310 states that USE-2 cable is not required to be AA-8000 rated if they are not marked RHH or RHW-2. So, in 2017 I don’t see any mention of any of this requirement and now in 2020 it’s back again with no exceptions. Well all of my city supply houses are only selling the old USE-2 triplex and in my case 350 USE-2. So yesterday I was shot down by a state inspector for running 250’ of this wire in an open trench. I had called him to discuss this job in preparation before I bought materials with no mention of enforcing the AA-8000 requirement. So, I’ve talked with the head of the state electrical board to plead my case and he says that if they make an exception for me then they will need to make an exception for everyone. Basically Im the first to get slapped with this; the supply houses are freaking out and it’s costing me thousands. One supply house said that the USE-2 exception still stands.
Everyone is confused about this including the state and city inspectors.. any feedback is appreciated!
 
I own my service lateral to my house, if it fails I have to replace it, but its before my meter so 'under exclusive control' of the utility, the NEC does not apply to it.

Here is some info from the NM website discussing 'customer owned power lines':
And they say you have to be a licensed contractor but follow applicable codes they mention the NESC which is whats used here in Oregon for service laterals.
That is not correct. The meter has nothing to do with the conductors being "under the exclusive control" of the utility. That is determined only by the service point. Only your utility knows where the service point many be. In this area, the service point is always on the line side of any customer owned conductors. So for an underground service, that service point will be the terminals of a pad mount transformer, or the end of a riser if the transformer is on a pole.
 
How many overhead residential services have you installed in your career? How many f the meter? Who provided the riser and conductor material? Were the riser conductors selected per utility requirements or per the NEC.
For a residential overhead service, our utility specifies that the service point is the load end of their service drop conductors, but for a commercial service the service point is at the secondary terminals of the utility transformers on the utility pole. The conductors from the pole transformer to the building are "overhead service conductors" covered by the NEC, unlike service drop conductors that are not covered by the NEC.
 
I own my service lateral to my house, if it fails I have to replace it, but its before my meter so 'under exclusive control' of the utility, the NEC does not apply to it.

Here is some info from the NM website discussing 'customer owned power lines':
And they say you have to be a licensed contractor but follow applicable codes they mention the NESC which is whats used here in Oregon for service laterals.
I say something is amuck, you cannot own a service lateral. Sounds like "underground service conductors" to me. Sometimes I install and provide the conduit for a service lateral, but I have never installed service lateral conductors conductors in that pipe, the POCO does that if its a service lateral.
 
Somehow both the power company and CID are calling this a customer owned service lateral.
What's the POCO? I checked the PNM Service Guide, and on Page 19 for single family residences with an underground supply from a pole mounted transformer, it says:

"The underground service cables and conduit, (extending from the point of service on your premises to the point on our pole where the connection is to be made) will be designed, installed, owned, maintained, and paid for by you. It is your responsibility that your facilities meet the size and depth requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC)."

The text on page 49 for a single business electrical service is not quite as explicit, but similar. So it certainly sounds like for PNM, the service point is on the pole when the electrical supply is underground. That makes the underground wires "underground service conductors," not a "service lateral," NEC-wise. I would imagine that whoever is calling them a service lateral is just not using precise NEC terminology.

Cheers, Wayne
 
"Customer owned service lateral" is a non-sequitur if the utility owns everything on the utility side of the service point. [Can the customer own some of the "facilities of the serving utility"? Seems like "of" implies ownership.] So I expect the OP meant "underground service conductors," not service lateral.

Cheers, Wayne
We have some utilities here that make customer/contractor supply and install raceway from pole/transformer/etc. to the structure supplied as well as install the meter socket at the structure supplied. The POCO specifies what size raceway to use, and has their own rules on burial depth, warning tape installation requirements, radius of bends used, etc.. Owner/contractor pays for those materials and cost to install. POCO does pull conductors, and takes over future maintenance of the installation. This is all POCO side of service point, and NEC doesn't apply even though owner did pay for portions of it. That said the POCO install specs are more stringent than NEC is as a general rule anyway so it still should pass NEC inspection other than whatever size and type of conductor the POCO might happen to pull in there. 400 amp service- they commonly pull 350 aluminum (not parallel conductors either) However for non dwellings they generally do require a spare raceway, should there ever be need for more conductor they may just utilize that spare. That said there generally is no room for that spare raceway in the meter socket being used so to use that spare raceway at a later time might involve changing some things to be able to use it.
 
That is not correct. The meter has nothing to do with the conductors being "under the exclusive control" of the utility. That is determined only by the service point. Only your utility knows where the service point many be.
Service Point is defined here as "The point of connection between the facilities of
the serving utility and the premises wiring." Some utility can't just come along and redefine that its a definition in enforceable law.
Premises wiring is always after the meter, and never under exclusive control of the utility.
I say something is amuck, you cannot own a service lateral.
Where in the NEC does it say who can own a service lateral?
I most definitly own mine, I checked.
 
"The underground service cables and conduit, (extending from the point of service on your premises to the point on our pole where the connection is to be made)
Wayne I dont know when the last time you worked on a utility pole was but they are under the exclusive control of an electric utility would you not consider the above Installation under the exclusive control of an electric utility ending at a point of service on the customers premises?
Would you really not say those conductors are the underground conductors between the utility electric supply system and the service point?
Wiring traveling up a utility pole is not a example of premises wiring, If I just started running conduit and wire up a utility pole I am sure I would have an utility employee telling me its not my premises.
 
Last edited:
Hi,
This keeps getting more interesting by the minute. I just talked with the PNM engineer who approved and designed the transformer upgrade. According to him my job was at the end date for allowing customer owned services in the area. He knew about the issue about AA-8000 but wasn’t sure whose jurisdiction it was at the time I talked with him. He was intrigued and wants a day to research; possibly making it a PNM owned service.
 
Hi,
This keeps getting more interesting by the minute. I just talked with the PNM engineer who approved and designed the transformer upgrade. According to him my job was at the end date for allowing customer owned services in the area. He knew about the issue about AA-8000 but wasn’t sure whose jurisdiction it was at the time I talked with him. He was intrigued and wants a day to research; possibly making it a PNM owned service.
There is much history around the differences between a 'premises wiring' covered under the NEC and OSHA 1910 Subpart S and an 'electric transmission or distribution installation' under covered under §1910.269 and the NESC. Lawyers and legal experts have looked this over going back to the 90's one was the American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA) had to get a OSHA clarification for its membership of large industrial paper-mills, where co-generation and all kinds of stuff blur the lines.
You see the OSHA rules are different for 'premises wiring' and 'electric transmission or distribution installation' and it was a big deal knowing which rules to follow, and thus knowing where the service point is.
The TLDR It does not matter who owns it all that matters is if they are under 'exclusive control of the utility' they are a part of a 'electric transmission or distribution installation' and fall under the NESC, the NEC section is 90.2(5)(a).
Prepare a written complaint to CID
 
Service Point is defined here as "The point of connection between the facilities of
the serving utility and the premises wiring." Some utility can't just come along and redefine that its a definition in enforceable law.
Premises wiring is always after the meter, and never under exclusive control of the utility.

Where in the NEC does it say who can own a service lateral?
I most definitly own mine, I checked.
One might even have to pay some amount for primary side conductors, transformer, and associated items when you have service ran to your location. Generally all those items are still considered to be on utility side of the service point and are not subject to NEC. The utility company may or may not install this equipment either but is installed to their specifications and they normally do take over maintaining it after initial installation and customer doesn't technically own it. It is usually billed out as aid in construction costs or some similar wording and not so much billed out as a sale or service to the customer. In fact if the line in question is run along public right of way, nothing really prohibits some neighbor from being able to have their future service tapped from what you ended up laying down some cost for. sometimes there is arrangement that they may need to reimburse you some amount, sometimes that has a time frame attached to it and no longer needs reimbursement after that time period.
 
Top