He does not operate the business we are discussing as a construction company. That plumber learned a different business model than return the calls you feel like when you get back home after working all day and tell them it'll cost them $75/hr because that is what the plumber that he called to find out what he should be charging told him. His message and delivery is a lot different than most in his area of service. His marketing reaches many more people in his target market than that article ever will. He knows a lot more about how to run a residential service business than you ever will.
Ok, I agree that his model is what it is based on years of experience in his local market. OTOH, the guy charging $75/hr also probably knows what he's doing or what he needs to do to stay in business and make a profit. It's also true that we don't have all the details, including whether or not the owner encourages his employees to use some kind of intimidation on customers.
I doubt you offended anyone, but I don't see it as an attack;
Its quite obvious you don't quite know what you're talking about, and the other member was trying to point that out to you. Hopefully for your benefit.
However long you were in business or in the trade is irrelevant; I've learned that's not a good indicator of a person's trade or business knowledge.
I hope I didn't offend anyone, since that certainly wasn't my intent. Adding a statement containing "than you ever will" is usually a sign of a personal bash of some kind. That's all I was reacting to. I'd be fine with someone explaining their argument clearly. Then we could have a discussion and I might learn something, or vice versa.
That is the real question. Ron Burley seems to think that because the plumbling service tech said that this was a "major rebuild" that he misreprensented the problem. He even goes so far as to say he lied to the customer.
Here is an angle that most customers and journalist don't consider. He refers to the plumbing contractor as "trades people" when he should be referring to them as "business people" and "salespeople". He assumes that a service tech is nothing more than a plumber in uniform but forgets that he is also a trained salesperson. A trained salesperson will normally know just how far they can go without actually breaking the law.
I trained as an insurance agent many years ago and one of the things that was taught was the difference between giving an impression about something and actually lying . Lying to people is against the law and will get a license taken but giving a person an impression without lying is just good salesmanship.
The service tech (salesperson) told the customer that it was going to be a major rebuild of a toilet. This may give the customer the impression that it will involve at lot of work but is it really a lie? He did disassemble the toilet and replace parts and then reassemble the unit. I doubt if there is a formal definition of a major toilet rebuild in existance. This puts a statement into a gray area where it can give almost any impression.
If customers don't consider service people as sales people they are just being naive. They would probably prefer to deal with a plumber that's nothing more than a plumber but there is no law against a service company training their techs to sell.
If an appliance repair person comes to a home to repair a washer and tells the customer that replacing a tub gasket or something similar is a major proceedure it's a judgement call to decide if he is lying. This may in fact be considered a major repair, who decides?
This journalist ( Ron Burley ) thinks that he is in a position to make this judgment call. He is only useing what he thinks is correct to make this judgment. He gets one other price from another plumber ( probably Joe the plumber) and quotes that, but one other estimate is meaningless unless they have been to the job site and actually know everything that was involved.
Remember that Assured plumbing didn't back down and nothing was said about any charges being filed against the company and they didn't even refund any money so they sound pretty sure of their position.
Before calling someone or some business a bunch of crooks you need a little more than the word of the customer as to what was said and how it was said. This plumbing contractor may be useing nothing more than good sales techniques that are well within the law.
Half the businesses in America over inflate the actual value of the goods and services they sell and this is considered nothing more than good salesmanship. When they cross the line and actually start to lie to people thats' when they get into trouble.
It is my opinion that if some company is useing deceptive business practices or lying to customers that they should be reported to the proper authorities but not have stories written without proof or a court judgment.
You are still innocent in this country until proven guilty of something and I don't see any proof of wrong doing.
The only thing we know for sure is that the customer was unhappy with the price ( nothing new there) but the rest is all speculation based on the opinion of a journalist and a customer.
I would pretty much agree with most of what you say. In this country we have very little consumer protection. MSDS are only available for certain products, and no one follows any kind of ISO standards or other system, so we have no clue how good or bad most products or services are. That's why I have to disagree with your comment that short of lying, anything goes in sales. It goes, but only until customers catch on. Someone here wrote about a bridge rectifier that cost $15 or $80 something depending on where you buy it and he obviously isn't paying the higher price anymore
The reality of credit card purchases is that it's usually the first course of action to contest a charge through the card company, then some kind of omsbudsman, and finally court. Maybe because most charged amounts are relatively small? I don't know.
Sounds like he replaced almost everything in the toilet. That is a major rebuild. Sure, it is just a toilet. But the fact remains...He replaced every part [or almost ] in it. Seems major to me for that particular piece of equipment. And a skilled craftsman in his trade is a skilled craftsman. Whether it is a plumber, bricklayer, painter, electrician, insulation installer....regardless of how many tools it takes to do their job.
The word "major" is obviously pretty unclear. I have a $5000 espresso machine that would also cost about $900 to do a major rebuild on. If I went to check a two lamp ceiling fixture and saw that it needed two new sockets and told the customer it needed a "major rebuild" that would cost $500, would you respect me in the morning?
Perception really means a lot doesn't it? You think I'm offended. I just think you don't know what your talking about and try to offer a different view for you to see. I speak very frankly and directly. It doesn't mean I think I'm a better peson than you.
Perception is everything, otherwise this thread wouldn't exist
I think that instead of being clear about what you want to say, you're less precise which is frustrating for me. I'm very willing to dialog stuff or I would have let this thread go by long ago, but I think this is the kind of topic where there isn't a cut and dry truth for everyone so it's good to talk about. If you see a problem with how I think of doing business, it's enough to describe what you see as wrong. I'll either agree or not, but I won't take it personally.
As far as some of my views on business go, I have a pretty well defined ethic to my approach. That doesn't mean that someone else's system is wrong or that mine is better, just that that's where I'm coming from and that for me it's next to impossible to separate business from my ethics. It's that system of ethics that makes me want to do code compliant work - not a fear of getting caught or being held liable. The most extreme example I can give of what I try hard not to be is this story - When I was running my cafe I had a lot of American customers, many of whom were missionaries from various US based churches. One time a guy came in who was doing missionary work in the Ukraine while working for his US employer. It turned out that his job was selling missiles to the Ukrainian air force. I personally can't think of a more inappropriate job for a Christian missionary but I know that a lot of people see no problem with that mix, and I understand that. It just doesn't fit my ethical code.