Re: another electricution - metal street pole-baltimore!
iwire and bob,
i never said i was against home inspectors because they were "unqualified". they may be qualified to the requirements of their municipality or state, but in relation to a typical residence they can do little to protect the new home owner from purchasing a home with existing electrical problems in it. i do not like the idea that they communicate a signal to the new home owner that their home is up to code or is clear of electrical problems. or like the example i wrote about-- suggesting that the aluminum wire in a house was against code. i put myself in the place of the buyer - i would much rather spend my money on an a.c. contractor to evaluate the condition of the a.c.system. a licensed roofer to check the roof--etc.. it would cost more but it would mean something.
the subject of the ground rod at light poles is very basic --- if it serves no purpose --- and it adds confusion to those maintaining it --- why have it? yes, education is the key! take away the thought that the ground rod connection renders the pole safe from being electrified. it is a step in the right direction. why require something on any job that has no function?
guys---the "home inspector" and the "ground rod" have one thing in common---neither have a meaningful function!