Color Re-Coding

Status
Not open for further replies.

pierre

Senior Member
Re: Color Re-Coding

Roger makes a very important point in his posts, that is the NEC covers a vast amount of territory and when answering a question, the answer should go beyond our everyday normal usuage. Without the experience of some of the 'other' parts of the NEC, it is hard to give the proper answer, especially if it is a test question.

For the last poster who was told the conductors for 480/277 had to be identified BOY colors, that may be a POCO rule, it is not in the NEC. The Local Union I was in had the requirement of BOY colors for 480/277.

Pierre
 
Re: Color Re-Coding

I'll be from Missouri also. It is common practice for BOY and BRB but I have never found a requirement in NEC either.
 

tom baker

First Chief Moderator & NEC Expert
Staff member
Location
Bremerton, Washington
Occupation
Master Electrician
Re: Color Re-Coding

The color code was in the NEC until about the 1975 edition. It was removed as too many electricians were assuming a black wire was 120V.
Usually what determines the wire color used is what is on the truck.
 

earlydean

Senior Member
Re: Color Re-Coding

So, is there anything wrong with pulling three blacks and a white to all my 208/120 panels, and three blacks and a gray to all my 480/277 panels? Just so long as I identify this scheme at all my panels?
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: Color Re-Coding

Yes you could do that for the ungrounded conductors Earl, not sure the NEC still allows using white for one and gray for the other, we are required to do that in MA

You could use plain white for both voltages as long as the two systems are not in the same raceway or enclosure.
 

tom baker

First Chief Moderator & NEC Expert
Staff member
Location
Bremerton, Washington
Occupation
Master Electrician
Re: Color Re-Coding

Earlydean:
the first system grounded conductor is white or gray, the other is white with a stripe not green see 200.6(D)
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Color Re-Coding

Earl,
So, is there anything wrong with pulling three blacks and a white to all my 208/120 panels, and three blacks and a gray to all my 480/277 panels? Just so long as I identify this scheme at all my panels?
If these are branch circuits, that would be a violation of 210.4(D) because you have no way to identify the phase of the ungrounded conductors. If they are feeders there is no problem.
(D) Identification of Ungrounded Conductors. Where more than one nominal voltage system exists in a building, each ungrounded conductor of a multiwire branch circuit, where accessible, shall be identified by phase and system.This means of identification shall be permitted to be by separate color coding, marking tape, tagging, or other approved means and shall be permanently posted at each branch-circuit panelboard.
As long as the two systems are not in the same raceway or enclosure, then the use of white and gary as stated in your post is code compliant, however if the systems share enclosures, there is a violation of 200.6(D).
Don

[ January 02, 2004, 03:40 PM: Message edited by: don_resqcapt19 ]
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: Color Re-Coding

Originally posted by don_resqcapt19:
If these are branch circuits, that would be a violation of 210.4(D) because you have no way to identify the phase of the ungrounded conductors.
(D) Identification of Ungrounded Conductors. Where more than one nominal voltage system exists in a building, each ungrounded conductor of a multiwire branch circuit, where accessible, shall be identified by phase and system. This means of identification shall be permitted to be by separate color coding, marking tape, tagging, or other approved means and shall be permanently posted at each branch-circuit panelboard.[/b]
Don to be clear that only would apply to conductors of a multiwire branch circuit, not all branch circuits.

Or am I missing something?
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Color Re-Coding

Bob,
Earl's post specified 3 blacks and a white. That would be a muliwire circuit.
Don
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: Color Re-Coding

Originally posted by don_resqcapt19:
Bob,
Earl's post specified 3 blacks and a white. That would be a muliwire circuit.
Don
Yeah or it could one line to line circuit and one line to neutral circuit. :)
 

chicar

Senior Member
Location
Lancaster,Pa
Re: Color Re-Coding

This is a perfect example of when "common curtisy" should kick in. The N.E.C. is the minimum electrical code in all states. It is up to you to go beyond the code especially if it helps your fellow electrician. Most Commercial and Industrial electricians know how important it is to label wires color and circuit numbers. Black,Red,Blue,White 120/240v Brown,Orange,Yellow,Gray 277/480v is known throughout the land and should be In forced by the N.E.C. [My opinion] when you are troubleshooting other electricians work you know if they are experienced or not. I put my signature on my jobs by marking box covers as well as wires so the next electrician will understand, "whats going on" safely.
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: Color Re-Coding

Originally posted by websparky:
So they could black as long as they are identified.
Webspark the only time the ungrounded conductors are required to be identified is when there are part of a multiwire branch circuit.

Well also Rogers Iso systems. :D
 

electricman2

Senior Member
Location
North Carolina
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Re: Color Re-Coding

Quote by iwire,
Well also Rogers Iso systems.
Right On
Also I agree with chicar. I dont want someone looking at my work a year later and muttering to himself, "Who the h*** did this?" :(
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Re: Color Re-Coding

Originally posted by chicar:
Black,Red,Blue,White 120/240v Brown,Orange,Yellow,Gray 277/480v is known throughout the land and should be In forced by the N.E.C.
Welcome to the forum Chicar, just because I argue about NEC minimums that is not how I work, I agree common sense and courtesy are a good thing!

Go easy on that white for 120 and gray for 277 as that is an NEC violation now, (see Tom Bakers post back a little way in this thread)

Where I work in MA, White is required for systems under 250 to ground and gray for systems above 250 to ground.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
Re: Color Re-Coding

Go easy on that white for 120 and gray for 277 as that is an NEC violation now, (see Tom Bakers post back a little way in this thread)
It is only a violation where the grounded conductors from both systems are in a common raceway or enclosure.
Don
 

mdshunk

Senior Member
Location
Right here.
Re: Color Re-Coding

Is a little bit of phase tape so difficult or expensive that you wouldn't do it anyway? I'd remark it so that it matches the other systems in the building without even giving it a second thought... whether it was required or not. That just seems like the "workmanlike" thing to do. (Though I wouldn't hold it against a guy who didn't remark the phase conductors if time was of the essence)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top