mivey
Senior Member
Having little or no voltage is not the same as having little or no current. That seems to be one of his misunderstandings. Earth is our standard zero voltage reference but there is plenty of current in the earth.He says "if it had current on it people would be getting shocked and possibly killed everytime they touched a meter, panel, etc.
A bird on a wire is at the same voltage as the wire thus it "reads" zero voltage. Still plenty of current there in the wire.
By thinking of only one conductor, he is thinking the circuit is like a single piston oscillating back and forth to deliver energy. Instead, an AC circuit is more like a belt on a pully that is the mechanism for energy exchange: both sides of the belt (grounded and ungrounded) move. While they normally move in one direction, you could also have a motor/belt/pully mechanism that oscillates back and forth like an AC circuit.He seems to have his own theory that electrons get excited and alternate directions just on the ungrounded conductor.
It is a decent example because it also demonstrates the energy travels faster than the charges (electrons are the charges for most wires). The charges are like the molecules in the belt but the energy travels from the motor to the pully faster than the physical belt does.
Then what about electonics on a rocket ship? They leave Earth. Some are out in space and will never reach Earth again.He also is stuck on the thought that the electrons are trying to go to the ground and not back to the source.
The circuit is a charge pump assembly: it pumps out charges on one end and gets them back on the other. This is a mechanism for energy exchange (think of the belt and pully with motor on one end and a drive pully on the other end). The Earth does not have to be involved in the energy exchange at all.