electricmanscott
Senior Member
- Location
- Boston, MA
Not a code violation in anyones opinion
Violation of "good idea" code.
Not a code violation in anyones opinion
violation of "good idea" code.
I have offered a devils advocate opinion in the past that there are no allowances in 210.23 for this type of switching. It literally says "connected to the circuit." The panel schedule will show the disposal and the dishwasher on that same circuit, technically.
That said, there's no way the circuit could be overloaded, so it shouldn't be a code violation...
Because if the homerun is the common, and either load is connected to a different traveler of the same switch, then the loads cannot be simultaneously energized.George,
how is there "no way" the circuit could be overload? if you have a 10a dw and a 10a disp (which is a motor load and will exceed that on startup). how is there no possibility of it being overloaded?
I am not sure why everyone thinks a recep. is needed. Why isn't the 3 way suitable as a disconnect as long as it is within site of the appliances.I agree it is a bad idea and not a violation if both devices have accessable plugs for disconnects.
I am not sure why everyone thinks a recep. is needed. Why isn't the 3 way suitable as a disconnect as long as it is within site of the appliances.
Because if the homerun is the common, and either load is connected to a different traveler of the same switch, then the loads cannot be simultaneously energized.
210.23(A)(2).
Both units are fastened in place. The combined load shall not exceed 50 percent even though they are not permitted to be used together. Probably to avoid flaming wires when the switch fails to both on.
Good catch- I forgot about that.:grin:Wouldn't that violate 422.35 Since a 3-way doesn't indicate on/off?
I can't believe someone would even think of doing this.
Wouldn't that violate 422.35 Since a 3-way doesn't indicate on/off?
Good catch- I forgot about that.:grin:
I don't know why they require separate circuits. How long do people run their disposal? Mine is only run about 5 seconds each time.......!
pfalcon said:210.23(A)(2).
Both units are fastened in place. The combined load shall not exceed 50 percent even though they are not permitted to be used together. Probably to avoid flaming wires when the switch fails to both on.
I don't that the section you've posted actually says this.
NFPA70 said:210.23(A)(2) Utilization Equipment Fastened in Place. The total rating of utilization equipment fastened in place, other than luminaires, shall not exceed 50 percent of the branch-circuit ampere rating where lighting units, cord-and-plug connected utilization equipment not fastened in place, or both, are also supplied.
210.23(A)(2) Utilization Equipment Fastened in Place. The total rating of utilization equipment fastened in place, other than luminaires, shall not exceed 50 percent of the branch-circuit ampere rating where lighting units, cord-and-plug connected utilization equipment not fastened in place, or both, are also supplied.