- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC
- Occupation
- Retired Electrical Contractor
no-- I guess not, but then it seems totally worthless doesn't it? :grin:Even if it's a double insulated motor?
no-- I guess not, but then it seems totally worthless doesn't it? :grin:Even if it's a double insulated motor?
no-- I guess not, but then it seems totally worthless doesn't it? :grin:
Thats exception is a hard read, but it sounds like 6Ba is for replacement motors.
I think that the unbonded wet wood is a hazard with a pool where the water is bonded. We are required by the code to energize the water and if we don't also energize the wood or any other type of material that can be touched by a person in the water we have a hazard.
Yes I did not say that you didn't have to run the wire to the area of the pool pump. I was stating what good would the copper bonding do under the tub if it was not connected to anything else. Not sure that it would do much of anything.look at 680.26 (B) (6) (a) 08 NEC
Yes I did not say that you didn't have to run the wire to the area of the pool pump. I was stating what good would the copper bonding do under the tub if it was not connected to anything else. Not sure that it would do much of anything.
do you think that a #8 below a wood deck will do anything? I am just trying think what this would accomplish, i agree it is required but will it reduce voltage gradients in the pool area
OK. I'll buy into this. If you had a job to install this spa tub are you telling me that you would either lay the grid on the ground or take a sod shovel, lift up a layer of sod, install the grid under it and re-lay the sod ? You can't be serious about this can you![]()
It would have to be in direct contact with the wood to have any chance of working.do you think that a #8 below a wood deck will do anything? I am just trying think what this would accomplish, i agree it is required but will it reduce voltage gradients in the pool area
Don, Not sure what you mean by this. How is the water being bonded or energized ? How do you bond the wood, where do you bond it and in how many places do you bond it ? Are deck screws through the floor board to the rafter below considered a mechanical connection ?don_resqcapt19 said:I think that the unbonded wet wood is a hazard with a pool where the water is bonded. We are required by the code to energize the water and if we don't also energize the wood or any other type of material that can be touched by a person in the water we have a hazard.
Try this experiment - buy an 8' 2 x 4, take a piece of # 12 awg, screw it into one end and plug the other end of the wire into the hot side of a receptacle. On the other end of the 2 x 4 use a meter and measure from the end of the 2 x 4 to any solid ground you can find. Tell us how much voltage you have. If you can't find any unplug the wire, wet down the 2 x 4 and try the experiment againvango said:I mean, wet wood is conductive, even if it is dry on the outside surface.
That's simple. All deck lumber is now required to come supplied with a # 8 solid pigtail wire to simplify the bonding :grin:How would I bond it?
The water is being energized by the voltage drop on the primary and secondary neutrals that provide the building power. The code rules require that the pool bonding system be connected to the building electrical grounding system (the last part of 680.26(B) doesn't really mean what it says, as there is no way to have a bonding system that is not connected to the electrical grounding system if there is any electrical equipment associated with the pool) and this will energize the water. In areas where the utility uses phase to phase connections to the primary of their transformer, there will be very little voltage on the grounding system as you will only have the voltage drop on the secondary neutral conductor, but in areas were a phase to neutral connection is used on the primary of the transformer there will be more voltage. In some cases this voltage will be 5 volts (some studies show that this voltage on the water can make it very difficult for a person to leave the water if the deck is not at the same voltage) or more and the pool water and bonding system will be energized to this voltage. Not you will have to read the voltage to "remote earth" (earth that is outside the influence of any grounding electrode system or bonding system, often defined as 50' or more form any such system).Don, Not sure what you mean by this. How is the water being bonded or energized ? How do you bond the wood, where do you bond it and in how many places do you bond it ? Are deck screws through the floor board to the rafter below considered a mechanical connection ?
Scott, we wouldn't have this forum if the NEC were written so clearly that everyone was able to interpret it in exactly the same way. While I believe the CMP's devoted numerous hours into formulating all sections of the NEC there are some sections that have to be more carefully scrutinized. 680.26(B)(2) is one of those sections.You have no choice but to do this. Just as if it were an above ground pool surrounded by grass.
I'll accept your word for it. Whether you're right or wrong at least you're well spoken on the subject.The water is being energized by the voltage drop on the primary and secondary neutrals that provide the building power. The code rules require that the pool bonding system be connected to the building electrical grounding system (the last part of 680.26(B) doesn't really mean what it says, as there is no way to have a bonding system that is not connected to the electrical grounding system if there is any electrical equipment associated with the pool) and this will energize the water. In areas where the utility uses phase to phase connections to the primary of their transformer, there will be very little voltage on the grounding system as you will only have the voltage drop on the secondary neutral conductor, but in areas were a phase to neutral connection is used on the primary of the transformer there will be more voltage. In some cases this voltage will be 5 volts (some studies show that this voltage on the water can make it very difficult for a person to leave the water if the deck is not at the same voltage) or more and the pool water and bonding system will be energized to this voltage. Not you will have to read the voltage to "remote earth" (earth that is outside the influence of any grounding electrode system or bonding system, often defined as 50' or more form any such system).
I'm sure it gets more complicated if the deck is Trex or Timber Tech.:roll:As far as bonding the wood, I have no idea if it can even be accomplished, however it is my opinion that the code requires it. The most effective bonding would likely be a conductor run on the tops of the joists before the decking is installed.
Scott, we wouldn't have this forum if the NEC were written so clearly that everyone was able to interpret it in exactly the same way. While I believe the CMP's devoted numerous hours into formulating all sections of the NEC there are some sections that have to be more carefully scrutinized. 680.26(B)(2) is one of those sections.
The language in the 2005 code called for the EPBG to be placed under "paved walking surfaces" whereas the 2008 code calls for the EPBG to be included in "unpaved" surfaces. I'm sure that over 95% of the spa installations we'll all come across will include some type of paved surface. (Is wooden decking considered a paved or unpaved surface ?) However, the OP did mention that the spa tub will be sitting on either soil or concrete. In the case of concrete there's no discussion required. However, in the case of soil you have to just sit back and ask yourself "If I filed under the 2005 code am I going to dig up the sod and lay down a 3' bonding grid under it "? If I filed under the 2008 code am I going to trench down 4" - 6" and lay in a # 8 solid wire all the way around the tub ? In either case, if you gave a price to do the job would you get it knowing that you had to install the grid (labor and material)?
I am of the opinion that section 680.26(B)(2) needs to be revised again and fine tuned. I think the CMP came to the realization that the bonding grid in the 2005 code added more expense to the job than safety benefit and changed that requirement in the 2008 cycle. This section needs to be looked at again and the language changed or made more clear.