goldstar
Senior Member
- Location
- New Jersey
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
Gus,Phil, why woud the hazrad be any less on an existing situation.
If a equipotential grid is needed on a new install would it not be needed on a retrofit ?
I don't believe there's any difference in hazard potential in either case. However, I think the code section needs to be revisited and here's my reasoning : What difference would it make if the EPBG were placed just under the edge of the tub and then bonded to the motor ? Would you truly get that much less benefit if the wire didn't fall within the 18"-24" perimeter of outside of the tub ? In the case of a concrete slab couldn't a ground rod or two be driven near the tub and bonded to instead of breaking up the entire slab ? Wouldn't you get the same benefit ? This section of the code only deals with new tub installations where disturbing soil or landscaping is not an issue. Quite frankly, all it does is increase the cost of the entire tub installation and in many cases discourages homeowners from even buying a tub. It also leads to the probability bootlegged work getting done by unscrupulous contractors or homeowners themselves. I'm not suggesting that the CMP's make this section of the code more lenient in all cases but they should realize that everything isn't always so cut and dry and some concessions could be made. There are a lot of smaller homes in my area that barely have a front lawn to speak of and in many cases their back yards are almost all patio. Compelling these homeowners to break up their patios or dig up whatever lawn they have I think is rather extreme.
Just my opinion.