Did see anything other than in 869A.UL 67 applies to the meter disconnect assemblies.
What do you think of the house garage scenario proposed in post #51?
Did see anything other than in 869A.UL 67 applies to the meter disconnect assemblies.
Here is another example of a more typical install:
Say we have a 320A meter on a detached garage and one 200A disconnect for the garage & well pump and one 200A breaker for a feeder the house.
The conductors to the house would then be a feeder.
Now omit the 200A breaker and just continue the 3-wire conductors to the house, then they would be service conductors, still legal.
Now do you agree if we add back the 2nd 200A disconnects at the garage as an 'emergency disconnect' for the house the EC could still run a 3-wire feeder to the house? And it does enhance safety because now if there is a problem at the house the fire dept can kill the house breaker on the garage without pulling the meter and killing the water.
Not sure why the fire department would care about local water supply at a dwelling unit. In areas without hydrants, we bring our own water. The units that are dispatched will differ between location that has hydrants and one that doesn't......
Now do you agree if we add back the 2nd 200A disconnects at the garage as an 'emergency disconnect' for the house the EC could still run a 3-wire feeder to the house? And it does enhance safety because now if there is a problem at the house the fire dept can kill the house breaker on the garage without pulling the meter and killing the water.