Tony S
Senior Member
- Location
- Resting under the Major Oak UK
So what would your preferred solution be?
Redesign the whole thing to run at the supply frequency. It would be cheaper in the long run.
So what would your preferred solution be?
That's why I was suggesting just changing the motors. Then you probably wouldn't need a converter.3000A is a huge converter, and now you have a very expensive single point of failure with no obvious backup.
You mean something along the lines of what I suggested eaarlier?Redesign the whole thing to run at the supply frequency. It would be cheaper in the long run.
Yes.You asked what I would do.
It's usually the case in my experience.That is okay, in cases the cost of VFD is higher thanthe motor itself. Is it applicable in op case?
Major condition met. Other conditions, motor cooling at 50hz, load requirement at 50 are also to be checked.i would try to run it at 50you need a stepdown xfmr mv-lv anywaysget one that can be tapped 400-480 or as close as possibleset at 400 V so 400/50 = 480/60
Major condition met. Other conditions, motor cooling at 50hz, load requirement at 50 are also to be checked.
Torque remains the same since the flux strength is the same. Flux strength is determined by the V/Hz ratio and 400/50 is the same as 480/60. So if torque remains the same but speed drops by 20%, that's the only reason the power rating drops by 20%. For most machines, it's torque that we need, speed is secondary. It might still be important, yes, but if it were me, I'd try it. I've done this sort of thing dozens of times and generally speed is relatively easy to deal with.Cooling would be an issue
current remains ~ the same v goes down 16%, power down about 20%
but torque should remain ~ the same???
assume 100 hp at 1760 rpm T = 300 lb ft
if we drop power to 80 hp and speed to 1470 so T = 285 lb ft, 5% less
makes sense since T ~ i ~ field strength
an issue may be controls
assuming 480:120
400/4 = 100 vac, marginal
What if the load is fan/pump? Its output would be seriously affected by drop in frequency.
More like 40%.A 20% reduction in output would result in case of fan/pump loads.
Are you assuming output proportional to speed? If no, why?More like 40%.
A 20% reduction in output would result in case of fan/pump loads.
More like 40%.
Centrifugal is cube law.Are you assuming output proportional to speed? If no, why?
Centrifugal is cube law.
A 20% reduction in output would result in case of fan/pump loads.