georgestolz said:Brick or drywall doesn't matter, IMO.
What does matter is the inspector's interpretation of 210.52(C).
That's just nuts, IMO. I've never heard of that.jeff43222 said:The inspectors generally consider the side wall as part of the wall that gets measured for receptacles, so the measurement starts at the front edge of the countertop.
Look at it this way. An appliance in the kitchen has a two foot cord. If you install a receptacle on the back wall at just under 24", then you can set a toaster on the front corner of the counter and plug it in. It'll miss by, what, a few inches?
It's ludicrous to have to install a receptacle on a side wall to accomodate three square inches of counterspace in the corner that the back wall receptacle just barely can't reach.
That's not the way it's enforced in my neck of the woods, thank goodness.![]()
allenwayne said:I did a home 2 years that the entire back walls were glass bocks...
jeff43222 said:allenwayne said:I did a home 2 years that the entire back walls were glass bocks...
Those weren't walls -- they were windows! No need for any receptacles at all!![]()
I agree with Allen, again! (Scary, ain't it?)allenwayne said:jeff43222 said:allenwayne said:I did a home 2 years that the entire back walls were glass bocks...
Those weren't walls -- they were windows! No need for any receptacles at all!![]()
If they moved I would agree but if fixed then they count as a wall :wink:
LarryFine said:I agree with Allen, again! (Scary, ain't it?)allenwayne said:jeff43222 said:allenwayne said:I did a home 2 years that the entire back walls were glass bocks...
Those weren't walls -- they were windows! No need for any receptacles at all!![]()
If they moved I would agree but if fixed then they count as a wall :wink:
Stationary windows are considered to be wall space. If you cannot install a required receptacle in a wall, a floor-mounted receptacle within 18" of the wall qualifies.
Without seeing them, I'd have to say that they are, and don't call me Shirley. :wink:jeff43222 said:I have two piano windows in my living room that were designed to never be opened. Surely they aren't considered wall space.
The code says, ". . . fireplaces, and similar openings." I say that a chimney is "similar" to a fireplace, in that either (1) It is the other side of the fireplace, or (2) The fireplace is on a lower floor. More to the point, a chimney is similar to a fireplace in that it breaks the floor line of the wall into two sections: There is a wall section to the left and another to the right, and what is in the middle is not a wall. Now, I invite you to use an NEC citation to prove that I'm wrong.Jim W in Tampa said:The code says FIREPLACE it does not say chimney.
I can hang a picture on a door or on the fridge, but that does not make either one of them a wall.Jim W in Tampa said:Its a wall and you could hang a picture
charlie b said:The code says, ". . . fireplaces, and similar openings."
You may be able to hang a picture ON an operable door, but if the DOOR OPENING is to be useful, you can't hang a picture IN the opening. (Well, it could be small, or sideways, or. . .but you get my point.)charlie b said:I can hang a picture on a door or on the fridge, but that does not make either one of them a wall.
Walls can, and are on occassion, built of dissimilar materials. Rarely, if ever, during roughin, are the dissimilar materials assembled concurrently and as a unit. While a wall of one material is "roughed in" there will be a "hole" where the other wall of different material is to be. . .charlie b said:When 210.52(A)(2)(1) uses the phrase "or similar openings," I do not look for holes in the wall. I don't look for a hole I can walk through (i.e., a doorway) or a hole through which I can pass another log for the fire. I look for something that isn't a wall, something you could remove and leave the wall in place, something that would look like a hole during the rough-in stage of construction, if the wall was build first, and the other thing (like the chimney) was built into the hole in the wall.