Measuring for 25 Ohms or Less - 250.56

Status
Not open for further replies.
dereckbc said:
Yep a lot of people make that mistake and assume dirt has some funtion to clearing a fault, when in reality it has no function in regards to clearing faults on low voltage applications. The NEC forbids earth to serve as any fault clearing path.

Earth an only be used as a conductor in NESC applications and has an extremely important role in high voltage transmission.


I would like to take the liberty for Dereck to say I believe when he says "low voltage", he is referencing 600v and lower.



BTW:
Dereck, your response to the SPD grounding newsletter was extremely well written.
As a matter of fact (my opinion), I thought the newsletter and comments was the best one that we have seen to date yet on this website.
 
Pierre C Belarge said:
I would like to take the liberty for Dereck to say I believe when he says "low voltage", he is referencing 600v and lower.

BTW:
Dereck, your response to the SPD grounding newsletter was extremely well written.
Correct I mean 600 volt and less NEC applications

Looks like I struck a nerve with Cutler-Hammer folks getting their engineer and VP to respond. Looks like they said the same thing I did just with a different spin and phrasing.
 
okay you are saying it has no role in clearing the fault yet you are routing the fault to earth. that sure looks like a role in clearing an fault to me. Soars book on grounding says " systems are solidly grounded to prevent excessive voltage to to lightening, line surges, or unintentional contact with higher voltage lines and to stabilize the voltage to ground during normal operation" So what you are trying to say is that this only applies to 600 volts or more. I don't by that. that rod is functional, other wise why would you get a shock on a faulty circuit on a trailer house when the frame is not grounded and yet it wont trip the circuit breaker and yet the panel is grounded. the wires still terminate in the panel and even after you connect the frame it does not trip the breaker. That is low voltage and the ground rod dissipates the voltage. that looks like a functional operation to me. So I am just mistaken in my thought process. If it routes a fault to the earth and causes an ocp to operate that is not a function?

Very nice to meet you derek and you should link me to that article you wrote sounds good. I am always trying to learn.
 
Last edited:
cschmid,
So than can someone give me some examples of a FE (functional earth) devices?
I don' think there is any such thing.
If it routes a fault to the earth and causes an ocp to operate that is not a function?
It doesn't route the fault current to earth. The fault clearing path is fault to EGC to main (or system) bonding jumper to the grounded conductor.
that rod is functional, other wise why would you get a shock on a faulty circuit on a trailer house when the frame is not grounded
How does that make the earth "functional"?
yet it wont trip the circuit breaker and yet the panel is grounded. the wires still terminate in the panel and even after you connect the frame it does not trip the breaker.
A connection to earth will not remove the shock hazard. The only way to remove the shock hazard is to clear the fault, and the only way to clear the fault is to provide a low impedance path back to the power source.
Don
 
Has anyone seen the results of the "grounding study" the IAEI and ? were doing?

They had put in every method of grounding that was availible, at several sites around the country, in different soil conditions. The early results I saw showed that rebar in the footing actually gave you a lower reading than a UFER.

I'll have to see if I can come up with it. I think I know some of the guys that were working on it.

P.S. How many inspectors actually verify that a 10' ground rod was installed and not one of the 8' ones sold at the box stores?
 
John,
P.S. How many inspectors actually verify that a 10' ground rod was installed and not one of the 8' ones sold at the box stores?
Why would the inspector do that? The code does not require 10' rods.
Don
 
cschmid said:
Okay you are saying it has no role in clearing the fault yet you are routing the fault to earth. That sure looks like a role in clearing an fault to me.

No that is where you are stuck or confused. In NEC applications; fault or load current IS NOT permitted to use earth as a conductor. . Only in NESC applications is where earth is permitted to be used as a conductor for load and/or fault current. You need to grasp and understand this and why there is a difference. It has to do with Ohm’s Law. First consider an NEC application like a simple 20-amp 120 VAC circuit into a 25 ohm earth fault. 120/25=4.8-Amps. 4.8 amps is not a fault, it is a load to a 20-amp breaker. What ever point the contact is made at is now at 120 VAC only using Earth as a fault path. The breaker sees 4.8-amps as a normal load and is happy. You on the other hand now touch it, receive a shock, and wonder why because you think it is grounded. This is why the NEC forbids earth to be used as a conductor; it is simply not capable of doing so at low voltages because its impedance is too high to be of any use.

NESC applications are another story. Take a real simple example like a 20KVA transformer feeding your home. Assume the input voltage is 4160 fed with a 5-amp fuse, and that same 25-ohm earth impedance and tell us what you can figure out? Would the fault current be 4160/25= 167-Amps? Is 167-amps enough to operate a 5-amp fuse quickly and safely?

Soars book on grounding says " systems are solidly grounded to prevent excessive voltage to lightening, line surges, or unintentional contact with higher voltage lines and to stabilize the voltage to ground during normal operation"

Absolutely true, but they left out a couple of thing like; discharge static charges. All of which has nothing to do with clearing a fault on your side of the transformer at low voltages. Everything you just mentioned has to do with high voltages outside of your home either under the autority of NESC or God’s rules.

I never said the earth ground (Ground Electrode System) does not have a function, I am just saying it does not function the way you think it should..

I don't buy that a ground rod is not functional, other wise why would you get a shock on a faulty circuit on a trailer house when the frame is not grounded and yet it wont trip the circuit breaker and yet the panel is grounded.

Grounded to what? You need to use very specific definitions per NEC so we can understand your comments. Fault current under the scenario you just used will not use earth as a path, or at least any useful extent. Fault path is via the EGC, to the Ground Buss, through the Main Bonding Jumper, to the grounded circuit conductor, returning it to the source in which case is the utility transformer. There will be some current flowing through earth, but not enough to amount to anything useful or permitted
 
Last edited:
cschmid said:
Thank you again for the lesson. So the rod does serve a purpose and I understand the math. So my thoughts are right and wrong at the same time.
You are welcome. Now here is something to think about.

Grounding an electrical system to earth makes them inherently dangerous under normal operating conditions. Think about that for a while :)
 
Pierre C Belarge said:
...Dereck, your response to the SPD grounding newsletter was extremely well written.
As a matter of fact (my opinion), I thought the newsletter and comments was the best one that we have seen to date yet on this website.
I missed this. Is there somewhere we can get a look at this?

carl
 
One of the most surprising statements I ever had was from an inspector who did not ask for the second rod because he did not have a way of proving I needed it, instead of me proving I did not need it. I'm still getting over that one. :grin: No offense to the inspectors out there ;) , it's better to have more than you need. I just have never had that experience in any field.
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
John,

Why would the inspector do that? The code does not require 10' rods.
Don
You are absolutly correct.

What it does say is; The electrode shall be installed such that at least 8 ft of length is in contact with the soil......

Leave 4" up to hook up your clamp and I'm coming up with 7'8" in contact.

Yes I know you can bury an approved clamp, but that's only if it's not going through concrete which in reality leaves you another 4" short.

By the way I don't check, it was more of a point of interest. : )
 
Last edited:
ahh back to the books and yes I can see the inherent danger just in our conversations here. just so you know the trailer house issue was they added on a back porch and screwed into a wire and this was many years ago. When I boned the frame and the metal siding it didn't trip any breakers so I unhooked the bonding until I found the screw and re-bonded the frame and siding.

I promise to try and choose my wording better in the future.

remember the only dumb question never got asked.
 
John,
I have never seen a ground rod left above grade, other than in pictures. As far as checking there is no way unless you pull the rod out. Yes, you can look at the listing mark and info at the top end of the rod, but how do you know the other end was not cut off?
Don
 
Don long time ago and I mean like early 80"s. I believe I went form lug I mounted on frame to exterior wall along the foundation of addition and buried it to the disconnect. it was also one solid piece of wire.

you are able to read marking after driving? lol
 
Don, See that's the difference in locals, here we hardly ever see one buried. I was more playing devils avdocate. We get all juiced up about two rods at least six feet apart, but do we even know if, as you said, that it's really two halfs of the same rod.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top