- Location
- Placerville, CA, USA
- Occupation
- Retired PV System Designer
But the transformer(s) would waste the least power.Any three identical impedance 277 volt loads connected in a wye configuration would do the same thing.
But the transformer(s) would waste the least power.Any three identical impedance 277 volt loads connected in a wye configuration would do the same thing.
If it were CT metering and all the ungrounded conductors were smaller and had proper OCPD's for conductor size I'd agree.I think it is more of a measuring circuit so something like maybe a class one circuit
Wouldn't simple inductors (no secondary coils) do the same thing. Even capacitors that are wye connected?But the transformer(s) would waste the least power.
What kind of current will be drawn?some opinions here, but nothing definite https://forums.mikeholt.com/threads/ct-wiring-classification.106402/
Another long shot idea: I wonder if the AHJ and POCO would allow the EGC to be used for the neutral reference? I know some inverter manufacturers say you can to this (solectria and chint IIRC).
Through the neutral? Virtually zero. Within the meter it is literally a #12 or #14 wire that makes the connection to the neutral. That's why it would be stupid to run a #2/0 neutral from the disco nearly 200' away through 50 year old UG conduit to feed it.What kind of current will be drawn?
But until then, you did what the AHJ wanted to see. Amirite? Is that the AHJ "making up rules"? Just one example to try to get you to see where my statement in the other thread came from. Sorry to interrupt.What kind of current will be drawn?
In recent years they added requirements for grounded conductors at switch locations for potential occupancy sensors or other automation devices that previously used the EGC to complete a very low draw control circuit.
The OP addressed that in post #7, it would require an additional 100' of trenching and PV conductors.What happens if this meter is placed at the other end of the feeder, where the neutral is easy to get to?
Make that 180' under walkways and other concrete. When I posted that I had walked the site but I had not measured it.The OP addressed that in post #7, it would require an additional 100' of trenching and PV conductors.
Cheers, Wayne
I assume you exhausted this route, but POCO ha no flexibility on a metering setup that works with what is there? I wonder if the POCO could take care of the neutral by making a connection to the EGC when then install the meter....that scene from the shawshank redemption comes to mind when they give the warden that apple pie with some $100 bills under itMake that 180' under walkways and other concrete. When I posted that I had walked the site but I had not measured it.
My point was they decided that we shouldn't be using the EGC anymore as the neutral for occupancy sensors or other automatic switching devices that also have nearly a zero draw.Through the neutral? Virtually zero. Within the meter it is literally a #12 or #14 wire that makes the connection to the neutral. That's why it would be stupid to run a #2/0 neutral from the disco nearly 200' away through 50 year old UG conduit to feed it.
I think you need a noodle in both pipes 300.3(B)(1)Quick question if we have to pull a neutral: The existing conductors are (2) sets of 500kcmil copper in separate conduits. The neutral would only be for instrumentation and the AHJ is operating under the 2020 NEC, so the minimum size neutral (from Table 250.102) is 2/0 copper. Here's the question: can I pull that neutral through just one of the conduits? The conduits are different sizes; there is room in one but not the other.
I don't know but that is a really good question; thanks!Any way to break it up from 2 parallel runs to 2 separate feeders?
What about the exception to 300.3(B)(1)? The conductors are run UG in nonmetallic conduits in close proximity to each other.I think you need a noodle in both pipes 300.3(B)(1)
Upon reflection, I don't think we can do that without unconnecting both ends of the parallel sets and feeding them with two reduced OCPDs. We don't want to have to deal with the ancient switchgear.Any way to break it up from 2 parallel runs to 2 separate feeders?
lost track of if it was mentioned what this is, but it would still be do-able if outdoors as you have no length limit on feeder taps.Upon reflection, I don't think we can do that without unconnecting both ends of the parallel sets and feeding them with two reduced OCPDs. We don't want to have to deal with the ancient switchgear.