If the fridge cannot maintain a relatively constant temperature for a few hours with the doors closed, there is something wrong with it. Heck, even my camping cooler can keep things safe for two hours.I would have thought the same thing. I even told him that as long as the doors are closed, the food should stay fresh, but he says that even with the doors closed the temperature gets warm enough within a short time span.
This guy is a little wild. He has ammeters clamped on all over the place. around the mains, around the branch breakers, around the ground rod... if current can flow on it, hes clamped a meter around it. hahaha.
I get my hands in it when I can. I think the guy is up to 7 or 8 different electricians at his house poking around. I had phoned a good retired electrician recently to come help as well. Even he was stumped.
I'll shoot a private message to Fred... thanks for the tip. The data just doesn't make sense. I haven't seen a situation like this before.
I think they are busy fighting for Right To Repair. Things today are throw away... its a shame. But he did have the refrigerator replaced once, then a repair guy came and replaced parts they thought could be wrong... no change.It sounds like he gets more attention from electricians rather than his appliance repair people (do they still exist?).
Negative power factor is one way to describe backfeeding or reverse power. No reason to believe that's going on here though.Surely it is leading or lagging PF, not negative/positive??
Leading or lagging. Not negative.Negative power factor is one way to describe backfeeding or reverse power. No reason to believe that's going on here though.
If the measurement devices (CTs) are installed or connected backwards, then you get a negative power factor measurement by convention, but not in reality. I.e user error.
If reverse power is conventionally negative, and power factor is real power over apparent power, then power factor will be negative when power is flowing in reverse.Leading or lagging. Not negative.
But it is not negative. AC are just that - alternating, neither positive nor negative.If reverse power is conventionally negative, and power factor is real power over apparent power, then power factor will be negative when power is flowing in reverse.
Convincing a seasoned EE
I'm trying to convince an EE hired by the property owner that there will be very little to no current flow on the Neutral so as not to have to take an 0.8 derate in a 277/480 combiner panel wiring (no loads, just my 3 SMA Core 1 inverters). He's telling me 277V loads inside the building will...forums.mikeholt.com
Here is the summary as I understand it:
Correct me if I missed anything.
- Flickering lights + fridge issue. Newly purchased house newly built.
- With the main breaker off electrician measured 5-10A current on the neutral.
- Clamping by electrician on the EGC also showed objectionable current.
- Utility pulled meters from the neighbors and discovered that neutral current increased at the house.
- Utility installed their own data logger and did not share results.
- Utility dragged their feet for months and just recently replaced the transformer.
- Homeowner tried different LED bulbs.
I suspect Utilities never do stuff they dont have to so probably was a issue on their end.
Things we dont know :
- Did they recheck the current on the neutral now that transformer has been replaced?
- Does the utility use TWACS metering?
- Do the lights still flicker after transformer has been replaced?
- Do the lights still flicker with incandescent bulbs?
Agree, it is just the relationship of the voltage to the current waveforms. I guess if you somehow stipulated that positive current flow is toward the customer, then you could have "stipulated" yourself into a negative power factor, but personally don't believe the definition supports that. Definition follows: the ratio of the actual electrical power dissipated by an AC circuit to the product of the r.m.s. values of current and voltage. The difference between the two is caused by reactance in the circuit and represents power that does no useful work." In other words, PF only seems to be defined for dissipation, not generation.But it is not negative. AC are just that - alternating, neither positive nor negative.
So if you set up a device to measure dissipation in a circuit but it ends up measuring generation then how do you choose to signify that?Agree, it is just the relationship of the voltage to the current waveforms. I guess if you somehow stipulated that positive current flow is toward the customer, then you could have "stipulated" yourself into a negative power factor, but personally don't believe the definition supports that. Definition follows: the ratio of the actual electrical power dissipated by an AC circuit to the product of the r.m.s. values of current and voltage. The difference between the two is caused by reactance in the circuit and represents power that does no useful work." In other words, PF only seems to be defined for dissipation, not generation.
Mark
It's common that people assign a false sign to power factor, even though a net real power consumption of any kind is technically positive (assuming that's your sign convention). The phase angle can be positive or negative, and people commonly pass through the sign of the phase angle as the de-facto sign of power factor, even though both are technically a positive power factor.Surely it is leading or lagging PF, not negative/positive??
I know what the score is. I was just trying to do it gently.It's common that people assign a false sign to power factor, even though a net real power consumption of any kind is technically positive (assuming that's your sign convention). The phase angle can be positive or negative, and people commonly pass through the sign of the phase angle as the de-facto sign of power factor, even though both are technically a positive power factor.
Truly negative power factor would mean the average value of the product of I(t) and V(t) is negative over a full cycle, which would only happen if real power were flowing in the opposite direction you were expecting.
No matter the measurement device, generation is not dissipation.So if you set up a device to measure dissipation in a circuit but it ends up measuring generation then how do you choose to signify that?